> http://www.commandprompt.com/blogs/joshua_drake/2008/04/is_that_performance_i_smell_ext2_vs_ext3_on_50_spindles_testing_for_postgresql/
>
> It doesn't cover XFS but it provides a decent and simple comparison on
> ext2/ext3 etc...
Yeah, it doesn't test actual log writing, though. Nor specific
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 10:50 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > There's a number of blog tests floating around comparing XFS and Ext3,
> > and the various Linux schedulers, for PGDATA or for an all-in-one mount.
> >
> > However, the WAL has a rather particular write pattern, and it's
> > reasonable to a
> There's a number of blog tests floating around comparing XFS and Ext3,
> and the various Linux schedulers, for PGDATA or for an all-in-one mount.
>
> However, the WAL has a rather particular write pattern, and it's
> reasonable to assume that it shouldn't be optimized the same way as
> PGDATA.
All,
There's a number of blog tests floating around comparing XFS and Ext3,
and the various Linux schedulers, for PGDATA or for an all-in-one mount.
However, the WAL has a rather particular write pattern, and it's
reasonable to assume that it shouldn't be optimized the same way as
PGDATA. Has an
