The Friday 04 June 2010 15:59:05, Tom Lane wrote :
> Marc Cousin writes:
> > I hope I'm not going to expose an already known problem, but I couldn't
> > find it mailing list archives (I only found
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql- hackers/2009-12/msg01543.php).
>
> You sure this isn't the
On Friday 04 June 2010 15:59:05 Tom Lane wrote:
> Marc Cousin writes:
> > I hope I'm not going to expose an already known problem, but I couldn't
> > find it mailing list archives (I only found
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql- hackers/2009-12/msg01543.php).
>
> You sure this isn't the we
Marc Cousin writes:
> I hope I'm not going to expose an already known problem, but I couldn't find
> it mailing list archives (I only found http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-
> hackers/2009-12/msg01543.php).
You sure this isn't the well-known "ext4 actually implements fsync
where ext3 didn't"
Hi.
I hope I'm not going to expose an already known problem, but I couldn't find
it mailing list archives (I only found http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-
hackers/2009-12/msg01543.php).
On one of my (non production) machines, I've just seen a very big performance
regression (I was doing a ve