>It's probably not a good idea to choose your clustering technology
>based on the web interfaces... Running 3 pgpooladmin doesn't seem like
>a huge thing.
No - our choice will be made based on the performance of the cluster, the
scalability and finally the amount of work involved in configuration,
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 07:32, Jorgen wrote:
>>No. pgpoolAdmin only supports one pgpool-II server.
>
> We have installed pgpoolAdmin, and it is a good and easy to use web app. So
> we now have to choose between 3 x pgpoolAdmin or go for PostgresXC.
It's probably not a good idea to choose your clus
>No. pgpoolAdmin only supports one pgpool-II server.
We have installed pgpoolAdmin, and it is a good and easy to use web app. So
we now have to choose between 3 x pgpoolAdmin or go for PostgresXC.
Jørgen Münster-Swendsen
www.kms.dk
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.
> Can pgpoolAdmin utility handle(administer) more than one pgpool-II custer?
No. pgpoolAdmin only supports one pgpool-II server.
> We have a need of setting up 3 independent postgres clusters. One cluster
> handling cadastral maps, one handling raster maps and one handling vector
> maps. Each of
> Can pgpoolAdmin utility handle(administer) more than one pgpool-II custer?
No. pgpoolAdmin only supports one pgpool-II server.
> We have a need of setting up 3 independent postgres clusters. One cluster
> handling cadastral maps, one handling raster maps and one handling vector
> maps. Each of
Can pgpoolAdmin utility handle(administer) more than one pgpool-II custer?
We have a need of setting up 3 independent postgres clusters. One cluster
handling cadastral maps, one handling raster maps and one handling vector
maps. Each of these clusters must have a load balancer - EG pgpool-II.
Inte
