Re: [PERFORM] poor performance involving a small table

Colton A Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote .. > Seq Scan on sensor (cost=0.00..1.25 rows=1 width=6) (actual > time=0.055..0.068 rows=1 loops=1) > Filter: (sensor_id = 12) > Total runtime: 80164

Re: [PERFORM] poor performance involving a small table

Seq Scan on sensor (cost=0.00..1.25 rows=1 width=6) (actual time=0.055..0.068 rows=1 loops=1) Filter: (sensor_id = 12) Total runtime: 801641.333 ms (3 rows) Can anybody help me out? Thanks so much! Does your table have millions of dead rows? Do you vacuum once an hour? Run VACUUM FUL

Re: [PERFORM] poor performance involving a small table

Colton A Smith wrote: Hi: I have a table called sensors: Table "public.sensor" Column | Type |Modifiers -+--+- senso

[PERFORM] poor performance involving a small table

Hi: I have a table called sensors: Table "public.sensor" Column | Type |Modifiers -+--+- sensor_id | integer