Scusa, scadenze a parte, ma non vi è sembrato il caso di chiedere a chi sta
gestendo il progetto prima di rimuovere una risorsa?
Grazie comunque.
Emanuele
Il giorno 28/ott/2010, alle ore 23.48, Trenta sis ha scritto:
> Well, I have solved executing with more RAM, and then works correctly
>
> Th
Well, I have solved executing with more RAM, and then works correctly
Thanks
2010/10/28 Cédric Villemain
> 2010/10/28 Trenta sis :
> >
> >
> > There are about 100.000 inserts and 30 updates. Without transaction
> it
> > seems that works, but with a transaction no. Witt about only 300.000
2010/10/28 Trenta sis :
>
>
> There are about 100.000 inserts and 30 updates. Without transaction it
> seems that works, but with a transaction no. Witt about only 300.000 updates
> it seems that can finish correctly, but last 20% is slow because is using
> swap...
>
> Any tunning to do in this
On 10/28/2010 02:38 AM, Trenta sis wrote:
Hi,
I have a Linux Server (Debian) with Postgres 8.3 and I have problems
with a massive update, about 40 updates/inserts.
If I execute about 10 it seems all ok, but when I execute 40, I
have the same problem with or without a transaction (I
Trenta sis wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a Linux Server (Debian) with Postgres 8.3 and I have problems with a
> massive update, about 40 updates/inserts.
Updates or Inserts?
> If I execute about 10 it seems all ok, but when I execute 40, I have
> the same problem with or without a tr
