"Josh Berkus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Just FYI, I have committed code for 7.1 that allows ORDER BY to work
>> correctly for a UNION'd query. A limitation is that you can only do
>> ordering on columns that are outputs of the UNION:
> As far as I know, that limitation is standard to all SQ
Hi,
Has anyone installed postgresql on a box running Win9X, if so, could you
provide some pointers on getting started.
Regards,
Craig May
Enth Dimension
http://www.enthdimension.com.au
Tom,
> Just FYI, I have committed code for 7.1 that allows ORDER
> BY to work
> correctly for a UNION'd query. A limitation is that you
> can only do
> ordering on columns that are outputs of the UNION:
As far as I know, that limitation is standard to all SQL
that supports UNION; the relational
"Saltsgaver, Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After I ran into this condition, the first thing I tried was to grant
> permissions back to myself. PostgreSQL shot me down with a permission
> denied error. So I had to log is as the superuser and then grant
> permissions to myself.
Are you sur
After I ran into this condition, the first thing I tried was to grant
permissions back to myself. PostgreSQL shot me down with a permission
denied error. So I had to log is as the superuser and then grant
permissions to myself.
Thanks for everyone's help. So would an exceptable workaround be t
