In fact I'm trying to migrate a database from Informix IDS to Postgres. This
IDS database uses CHAR so I just let the same.
Now I'm conviced that I sould convert CHAR to VARCHAR.
Thanks.
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Dani Oderbolz
>
Gunter Diehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> create funtion f1(v, v) returns void as '...'
> create rule vupt as on update to v do instead select f1(new, old)
> While accepting this definitions, pg says it can not handle "whole-tuple
> references" at runtime.
FWIW, the "old" case works fine. "new"
On Wednesday 25 June 2003 11:00, Vangelis-Maria Tougia wrote:
> Hi,
> I found follwing email sent to you in internet.
> I am interested in same issue myself.
> Did you finally found out any more information about how to Update a column
> of a table by selecting value from another table?
Not sure i
Hi
I' would like to connect my postgres database on a linux server with
Delphi 5 Applications,which are located on Win95/98 Clients, very helpful
would be an example on how to realize a connection of these things
Thanks
Murali
Hi,
I found follwing
email sent to you in internet.
I am interested in same
issue myself.
Did you finally found out
any more information about how to Update a column of a table by selecting value
from another table?
Hello,If I understand the SQL references I have read, UPDATEs are
allow
> Am Sonntag, 22. Juni 2003 14:45 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> I have not used column check constraints before, but I'd like to
>> start using then and so would I'll like to know if there is a direct
>> way to provide feedback to the end user about data validation rules
>> expressed in column che
How to pass the special variables new / old to functions?
e.g. I'd like to to something like this (v is a view):
create funtion f1(v, v) returns void as '...'
create rule vupt as on update to v do instead select f1(new, old)
While accepting this definitions, pg says it can not handle "whole-tupl
> I could then do some queries against the temporary table without having to
> regenerate the results every time I want to show a "Page 299 of 500" toolbar.
Performance wise temp tables are the same as a regular table but without
WAL on the table contents.
> Would I be better off just sucking th
Hello everyone,
In the Intranet application I've been building over the past 9 months, I have
developed quite a beast of a search. I've asked for help here in the past on
performance tuning it, and have come to the conclusion that I've gotten it as
tweaked as I can without seeking the counsel
Wow, I had never actually faced this problem (yet) but I spied it as a
possible stumbling block for porting MySQL apps, for which the standard
practice is inserting a NULL. As I have made a fairly thorough reading
of the docs (but may have not cross-correlated every piece of data yet,
obviousl
Hello list,
I have followed the examples in README.tsearch about converting text columns to
txtidx type using the function txt2txidx() . Problem is.. some words become
chopped. "Database for dummies" becomes 'dummi' 'databas' , for example.
I also created a trigger to update the txtidx colum
On Thursday 26 Jun 2003 12:21 pm, Együd Csaba wrote:
> Urgent Help : Use of return from function/procedure.Hi,
> could anybody tell me what can be the difference between these queries?
> There are a big difference but I can't understand the reasons. For some
> reasons the firs query calculates getu
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 14:31:34 +0200,
Dani Oderbolz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It was written for MySQL, which can take NULL and then assign an
> auto_increment.
> However, in PostgreSQL I am getting problems, because it would not let
> me insert NULL
> into a NOT NULL column (which is p
Hi all,
I am struggling hard with a badly written piece of code.
It has such statements all over the place:
INSERT INTO TABLE A (NULL, Value1, Value2...).
It was written for MySQL, which can take NULL and then assign an
auto_increment.
However, in PostgreSQL I am getting problems, because it woul
Title: Urgent Help : Use of return from function/procedure.
Hi,could anybody tell me what can be the difference between these
queries?There are a big difference but I can't understand the reasons. For
somereasons the firs query calculates getup column in a wrong way. It
allwaysdevides with 10
Title: Object based Query Requirement.
Hi,
I use Postgres-7.2.4. and my client is in C++
I need to know the following:
As I user libpq++ library, I have to pass the query in the string format only. i.e.’const char *’
Does Postgres support object based query? i.e. User should make the obj
16 matches
Mail list logo