hi,
can anyone help me out on the following scenario:
why this is happening, if i'm doing any thing wrong or its the feature of postgres...
regards
cheetor
PostgreSQL
Steps:
1. Create a table
create table mytab (name
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: viernes, 30 de enero de 2004 7:08
Yeah, the problem with functional indexes is that the optimizer doesn't have
any clue how the records are distributed since it only has statistics for
columns, not your expression. Notice it's
Alexandra Birch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It works perfectly - thanks a million!
Strangely the offset 0 does not seem to make any difference.
Gotta read up more about subqueries :)
explain analyze
select code,order_date
from (
select code, order_date
from
Just a short question (PostgreSQL 7.3.4 on hppa-hp-hpux10.20, compiled by GCC 2.8.1)
SELECT ('' 'GDMF') ; SELECT ('GDMF' '');
?column?
--
f
(1 row)
?column?
--
t
(1 row)
Are these results standard compliant?
Looks at least pretty reasonable to me.
It's just because I
Christoph Haller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[ '' is less than 'GDMF' ]
Are these results standard compliant?
I doubt that the SQL standard really says anything on the subject, but
ISTM any rational string-sorting algorithm would put '' before anything
else.
It's just because I have a DBMS
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Christoph Haller wrote:
Just a short question (PostgreSQL 7.3.4 on hppa-hp-hpux10.20, compiled by GCC 2.8.1)
SELECT ('' 'GDMF') ; SELECT ('GDMF' '');
?column?
--
f
(1 row)
?column?
--
t
(1 row)
Are these results standard compliant?
I
Hi,
| You probably don't want to do that. The DESC only applies to the
| one expression it follows. What you want is probably:
| explain select datetime,id from trafficlogs order by
| datetime desc,id desc limit 20;
This is exactly what I was after - worked a treat!
Thanks.
Darren
O kyrios [EMAIL PROTECTED] egrapse stis Jan 29, 2004 :
Now i a get another wierd error
DEBUG] Transaction - -called safeRollback with null argument
java.sql.SQLException: ERROR: SET AUTOCOMMIT TO OFF is no longer supported
at
Thank you all guys. Thank you very much. Yeah it was the driver issue. I
was runnin postgres 7.4 but using the pg73jdbc3.jar driver. I did not know
that. Thank you all once again for your help.
--mohan
O kyrios [EMAIL PROTECTED] egrapse stis Jan 29, 2004 :
Now i a get another wierd error
