show client_encoding gives:
UNICODE
databases reads:
DATABASE OWNER ENCODING
mydb david UNICODE
testdb david SQL_ASCII
table columns are character varying(255)
Tx,
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Richard Huxton
Sent: Wedn
On Thursday, 11 November 2004 09:23, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> Stefan Weiss wrote:
> > These tables are connected by foreign keys, but without "on delete"
> > triggers.
>
> Why "without" ? Are you looking to solve a problem introduced by
> yourself ?
There are numerous checks involved before a cust
Achilleus Mantzios wrote:
O Michael Fuhr έγραψε στις Nov 10, 2004 :
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 12:45:19AM -0800, Riccardo G. Facchini wrote:
Sorry, but I understand that your example is not really about nested
transactions, but about sequential transactions.
Here's a more elaborate example. If this
Stefan Weiss wrote:
> On Wednesday, 10 November 2004 18:28, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>Achilleus Mantzios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>>Just a very naive thought
>>>Wouldn't make more sense to allow nested begin/commit/rollback blocks?
>>
>>We actually had it working that way initially, but change
