My version is PostgreSQL 8.0.3 on i686-pc-mingw32, compiled by GCC gcc.exe
(GCC) 3.4.2 (mingw-special)
- Original Message -
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hatuan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 4:19 AM
Subject: Re: [SQL] Sql select like
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new Resources site
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
hatuan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My version is PostgreSQL 8.0.3 on i686-pc-mingw32, compiled by GCC gcc.exe
(GCC) 3.4.2 (mingw-special)
Well, if it's 8.0.3 then you've found a new variant of the problem, but
we cannot fix it without a complete test case. Please read the bug
reporting
I have fixed it. I have pg8.03 but database is 8.0. I dump database and
reload it, it work well.
Thank for your help.
- Original Message -
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hatuan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 4:19 AM
Subject: Re: [SQL] Sql
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks
CTAS (Create Table As Select) command works fine!!! With great performance.
I think it is the best way to correct the data...(apparently)
I didnt know about select DISTINCT. I am going to read about it.
You
Original Message
Subject: [SQL] unsubscribe
From:U K Laxmi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:Thu, May 26, 2005 1:52 pm
To: hatuan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Tom Lane wrote:
I think he's got a good point, actually. We document the ARRAY-with-
parens-around-a-SELECT syntax as
The resulting one-dimensional array will have an element for
each row in the subquery result, with an element type matching
that of the subquery's
Hello,
I have 3 tables (2 tables + 1 lookup table that ties them) and running
a straight-forward aggregate count(*) query with a couple of joins
takes about 10 seconds (and I need it to be sub-second or so).
Also, I am wondering if this approach is scalable with my row-counts
and my hardware
