Hey,
Is it possible to create a new type as an alias to a pre-defined type? I
use USERID varchar(20) in almost every table I have I'd like to make
an alias for that type eg.
pseudo-sql
create type myschema.useridtype as varchar(20);
/pseudo-sql
I might have to alter the type some day and
O Veikko Mδkinen έγραψε στις Jun 22, 2005 :
Hey,
Is it possible to create a new type as an alias to a pre-defined type? I
use USERID varchar(20) in almost every table I have I'd like to make
an alias for that type eg.
pseudo-sql
create type myschema.useridtype as varchar(20);
On Jun 22, 2005, at 7:42 AM, Achilleus Mantzios wrote:
O Veikko Mδkinen έγραψε στις Jun 22, 2005 :
Hey,
Is it possible to create a new type as an alias to a pre-defined
type? I
use USERID varchar(20) in almost every table I have I'd like to make
an alias for that type eg.
pseudo-sql
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 08:04:39 -0400,
Sean Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just for my own edification, does creating a simple domain like this
then require a whole set of functions for indexing, etc., like other
more complex user-defined types, or will postgres do the right thing?
Veikko Mäkinen wrote:
Hey,
Is it possible to create a new type as an alias to a pre-defined type? I
use USERID varchar(20) in almost every table I have I'd like to make
an alias for that type eg.
CREATE DOMAIN username_string AS varchar(20);
Test it with your client applications though,
O Sean Davis έγραψε στις Jun 22, 2005 :
On Jun 22, 2005, at 7:42 AM, Achilleus Mantzios wrote:
O Veikko MΞ΄kinen ΞΞ³ΟΞ±ΟΞ΅ ΟΟΞΉΟ Jun 22, 2005 :
Hey,
Is it possible to create a new type as an alias to a pre-defined
type? I
use USERID varchar(20) in almost every table I
Richard Huxton wrote:
Veikko Mäkinen wrote:
Hey,
Is it possible to create a new type as an alias to a pre-defined type?
I use USERID varchar(20) in almost every table I have I'd like to
make an alias for that type eg.
CREATE DOMAIN username_string AS varchar(20);
Test it with your
Keep in mind, though. Using a DOMAIN in some definition 'seals' the domain.
Yo can't change the domain unless you drop all dependent objects
|-Original Message-
|From: Veikko Mäkinen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: Mittwoch, 22. Juni 2005 15:14
|To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
|Subject: Re:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, Russell Simpkins wrote:
Hello,
I have created a trigger function to update the sort_order column of a
mapping table. I have table a that has a many to many relation ship with
table b that is mapped as a_b where a_id, and b_id are the pk columns and
there is a
Stephan Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
CREATE TRIGGER u_test1 BEFORE DELETE ON portfolio.test1 FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE
PROCEDURE resort_test1();
I think this will work in an after delete trigger, but not in a before
delete trigger (and seems to in my tests). I'm not sure what the spec says
I suspect that if you read the spec carefully it would want a triggered
data change violation error raised here. My advice is not to use a
BEFORE trigger for this.
What would you recommend then. I am using Hibernate in my java application
and if the sort_order column (in this example
Hi,
I am trying to convert from SQL_ASCII to UNICODE.
I have a program that will read from a table in one database
and write to a table in a different database.
I am hoping this all I need do (One data base is SQL_ASCII and
the other is UNICODE).
I get a byte sequence error
Stephan Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there anything we have right now that will handle this kind of thing
without requiring either updating all the counts after a deletion in a
statement trigger or once per row updating all the counts for records with
the same a (doing something like
Actually, I had a larger script that did exactly what you propose. However I
started to think that a profecient where clause would do the trick.
In my mapping table, a and b are primary keys. a_id, b_id, c_sort_order.
a_id is the parent and b_id is the child for my purposes, so if a_id is
14 matches
Mail list logo
