Chris Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Achilleus Mantzios) writes:
>> I am just saying that the common saying "reindex is not needed for
>> 7.4+" maybe is not true in all circumstances.
> ...
> In versions earlier than 7.4, running a REINDEX periodically was
> *essential* i
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 16:08:19 -0400,
Jeff Boes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given a table like this:
>
> create table primary (
> a integer primary key,
> b boolean
> );
>
> And another like this:
>
> create table secondary (
> a integer,
> some_other_fields
> );
>
>
> I would lik
Given a table like this:
create table primary (
a integer primary key,
b boolean
);
And another like this:
create table secondary (
a integer,
some_other_fields
);
I would like a foreign key constraint on the "secondary" table that
looks something like:
foreign key (a, true) reference
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Achilleus Mantzios) writes:
> O Chris Browne έγραψε στις Jul 26, 2005 :
>> You can get a savings of about 4% of the space, but at the cost of
>> taking an appreciable outage during which the database is not usable.
>
> 1st not all database is unusable, during the whole reindexdb
Dmitri Bichko wrote:
Hello,
I have two tables, one has a foreing key from the other (only showing
the relevant columns and indices here):
Table "expresso.probes"
Column| Type | Modifiers
-++---
platform_id | inte
