On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 17:13 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Mark R. Dingee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
md5 works, but I've been able to
brute-force crack it very quickly,
Really? Where's your publication of this remarkable breakthrough?
I'd say you can't bruteforce md5, unless you're extremley
Mike Tom,
The script I'm using to break md5 presumes that the cracker knows the 3
elements being concatenated together to form the plain-text sting which is
then passed into md5. The method I'm using then begins running through
various permutations. Do you believe that the methodology is
Hello group,
I've a bunch of tables, which have just about the same name. They are just iterated like this:
tbl_table1
tbl_table2
tbl_table3
...
They all have the same field, but different data.
Now I'm wondering, if I have to write functions for every table, although they perform the same
Sorry, pushed the send - button by accident. So here is the right text:
CREATE OR REPLACE function getmaxuserid(integer) RETURNS integer AS'
DECLARE live_table varchar(100);
DECLARE i_return integer;
BEGIN
live_table := ''tbl_highscore_app'' || cast($1 as varchar);
SELECT i_return =
am 02.11.2005, um 14:30:38 +0100 mailte Moritz Bayer folgendes:
Hello group,
I've a bunch of tables, which have just about the same name. They are just
iterated like this:
tbl_table1
tbl_table2
tbl_table3
...
They all have the same field, but different data.
Now I'm wondering, if
am 02.11.2005, um 14:36:06 +0100 mailte Moritz Bayer folgendes:
live_table := ''tbl_highscore_app'' || cast($1 as varchar);
SELECT i_return = max(userid) FROM ''tbl_highscore_app'' || cast($1 as
varchar);
My parser tells me that this is not possible.
Correct. You should build your string
OK, you're not really breaking md5. If the attacker already knows
the information being encrypted, then all you're testing is the
concatenation order- Surely the information is more important than the
order? md5 is a one way hash function, and so using an alternate
algorithm will provide no
Thanks,
great thing! Since I have an select statement, I'll have to use a
cursor. Just as execute I haven't used it before. So I can say that
I've learned something today :)
Thaks again,
Moritz
Mark R. Dingee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The script I'm using to break md5 presumes that the cracker knows the 3
elements being concatenated together to form the plain-text sting which is
then passed into md5. The method I'm using then begins running through
various permutations. Do you
Hello,
I am trying to create a function that will allow
me to dynamically choose the ORDER BY sequence.
I also want the result of the SELECT statement to
be returned. Far as I can tell this can not be done
with EXECUTE alone rather I should use FOR .. IN EXECUTE.
The result of the statement is
Moritz Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've a bunch of tables, which have just about the same name. They are just
iterated like this:
tbl_table1
tbl_table2
tbl_table3
...
They all have the same field, but different data.
Now I'm wondering, if I have to write functions for every table,
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 17:00:50 -0500,
Mark R. Dingee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruno,
I use an authenticate() function as a part of state maintenance in a PHP web
app. In the function, I generate an encrypted token that is then used in the
validation process on subsequent pages. md5
Yeah, analyze did make a difference. See below.
--
Index Scan using october_begin_time on october_cdr_call
(cost=0.00..98383.82 r
ows=24594 width=568) (actual time=0.280..79274.579 rows=538592 loops=1)
Index Cond:
Thanks Bruno. I'm using a hash so I can merge info available in the HTTPS
header with data I store on the server so that the hash can be reconstructed
during the validation process from the raw elements. Tom Lane reminded me of
using random seeds similar to what you are suggesting. I think I
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 16:01:19 -0500,
Mark R. Dingee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Bruno. I'm using a hash so I can merge info available in the HTTPS
header with data I store on the server so that the hash can be reconstructed
during the validation process from the raw elements. Tom
Am 31.10.2005 um 19:53 schrieb Axel Rau:
The planner does not use the pk-indices. Poking around,
I could not find an operator class, which supports the containment ('') operator.
Is my conclusion correct?
How can the functionality be extended?
Is there any implementation available?
rtree_inet
Axel Rau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Question: Can rtree_inet be included in the core?
No, because rtree is going away in 8.2. Feel like converting that
code to be a GIST opclass, instead?
regards, tom lane
---(end of
Hi .
Just wanted to know what is equivalent of Oracle in postgresql.
select count(*) from table1 where id =1 where sqlplus plus will
prompt to enter value for 1. I would like to do the same in psql.
Thanks
Ashok
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9:
Ashok Agrawal wrote:
Hi .
Just wanted to know what is equivalent of Oracle in postgresql.
select count(*) from table1 where id =1 where sqlplus plus will
prompt to enter value for 1. I would like to do the same in psql.
There isn't an equivalent feature, I'm afraid. There are variables you
19 matches
Mail list logo
