Re: [SQL] timestamp query doesn't use an index ...

2006-05-20 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sun, 21 May 2006, Michael Glaesemann wrote: On May 21, 2006, at 10:42 , Marc G. Fournier wrote: -> Seq Scan on page_schedule ps2 (cost=0.00..2364.95 rows=33110 width=16) (actual time=0.021..623.363 rows=94798 loops=1) I don't know about rewriting the query, but it appears your statis

Re: [SQL] timestamp query doesn't use an index ...

2006-05-20 Thread Michael Glaesemann
On May 21, 2006, at 10:42 , Marc G. Fournier wrote: -> Seq Scan on page_schedule ps2 (cost=0.00..2364.95 rows=33110 width=16) (actual time=0.021..623.363 rows=94798 loops=1) I don't know about rewriting the query, but it appears your statistics are a little out of date (e.g., rows exp

[SQL] timestamp query doesn't use an index ...

2006-05-20 Thread Marc G. Fournier
I'm trying to figure out some way to speed up the following query: select ps2.page_id, ps2.template_component_id, max(ps2.start_time) from page_schedule ps2 where ps2.start_time at time zone 'MST7MDT' <= '2006-5-17 8:9:18' group by ps2.page_id, ps2.template_component_id When run throug

Re: [SQL] insert related data into two tables

2006-05-20 Thread Ash Grove
You need to manage the transaction: begin a transaction, execute your first insert, retrieve the ID with curr_val(), execute the sencond insert and commit the transaction. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > > I have two tables like these: > > TABLE_1: people registry > fields: ID_T1, SURN