> IDColor
> --- ---
> 1 Blue
> 2 Red
> 3 Green
> 4 Orange
>
> How would I rewrite the query to return results where the colors are
> replaced by letters to give the following results?
>
> IDColor
> --- ---
> 1 A
> 2 D
> 3 B
> 4 C
http://www.p
I have a query:
SELECT * FROM testtable;
Where the results are:
IDColor
--- ---
1 Blue
2 Red
3 Green
4 Orange
How would I rewrite the query to return results where the colors are
replaced by letters to give the following results?
IDColor
--- ---
1 A
2
> i think i've figured out the gist of the thought
> process behind the SQL query...
>
> 1. select everything from t_inspect_result as table a
> 2. select max timestamp value entries in
> t_inspect_result as table b
> 3. choose only choose those rows where the max
> timestamps of table a and b are
> > Richard,
> >
> > i got the expected rewsults! now i just have to
> study
> > the query to figure out what it does. -lol-
> >
> > i tried using AS, but i only did it in one place -
> > doh! the error message just moved to the next
> place i
> > didn't do it. i'll know better next time.
> >
> Richard,
>
> i got the expected rewsults! now i just have to study
> the query to figure out what it does. -lol-
>
> i tried using AS, but i only did it in one place -
> doh! the error message just moved to the next place i
> didn't do it. i'll know better next time.
>
> thanks for the hel
> > yields the following error:
> >
> > ERROR: schema "a" does not exist
> >
> > i tried to interpret you query and apply it to my
> > case, but, apparently, i didn't too good of a job.
> >
> > do you see the error?
>
> Hmmm... That is strange. but according to the
> PostgreSQL documentation
> yields the following error:
>
> ERROR: schema "a" does not exist
>
> i tried to interpret you query and apply it to my
> case, but, apparently, i didn't too good of a job.
>
> do you see the error?
Hmmm... That is strange. but according to the PostgreSQL documentation on
select you can add
--- Richard Broersma Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Richard, that is the result i would need given
> that
> > data set. i have to digest this version, though.
> >
> > should this query be more efficient than the
> subquery
> > version as the table starts to get large?
>
> My experience is th
> Table structures:
>
> ce_house
>
> house_id
> provider_id
>
> ce_contract
>
> contract_id
> house_id
> contract_term
> contract_created
>
> ce_contract_status
>
> contract_status_id
> contract_id
> contract_status
> contract_status
My current solution to the problem is PHP and it - simply put - sucks
I loop through all the house records for a user using the following query
SELECT * FROM ce_house
LEFT JOIN ce_contract ON ce_house.house_id=ce_contract.house_id LEFT JOIN ce_contract_status
On Jun 6, 2006, at 12:32 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:20:13AM -0700, codeWarrior wrote:
I would hope that your choice to use postgreSQL is because it is
superior
technology that scales well financially... not because you get a
warm fuzzy
from all your friends on the
11 matches
Mail list logo
