Beautiful Works a treat. Thanks
Aaron.
A follow-on problem now I have the
below column in the select, but I need to validate the value across all 3 rules
I need to assign it to a variable!!
Example my pqty function
calculates a value less than the suppliers minimum order qty (and
Emils wrote:
2006/7/7, T E Schmitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
valid entries would be:
28mm F2.8 (prime lens)
30-70mm F4 (zoom lens)
30-70mm F2.8 (zoom lens)
30-100mm F4.5-5.6 (zoom lens with variable speed)
If these are the cases, wouldn't the regex be simply:
^[\d\-]+mm for BASE
^[\d\-]+mm
Looking to keep 2 databases in
sync, at least semi-realtime if possible, although running a batch update
every x mins wouldn't be out of the question. One db is postgres and the
other is ms-sql. It's to keep inventory in sync from 2 seperate locations,
one being a brick and mortar store and
WearelookingfortheexactthingbutwithtwoPostgreSQLdatabases
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin
BednarSent: 10 July 2006 18:28To:
pgsql-sql@postgresql.orgSubject: [SQL] MS-SQL-Postgres
sync
Looking to keep 2 databases in sync, at least
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 11:27:52AM -0400, Kevin Bednar wrote:
Looking to keep 2 databases in sync, at least semi-realtime if possible,
although running a batch update every x mins wouldn't be out of the
question. One db is postgres and the other is ms-sql. It's to keep inventory
in sync
On 7/10/06, Phillip Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Beautiful – Works a treat. Thanks
Aaron.
A follow-on problem now… I have the
below column in the select, but I need to validate the value across all 3 rules
– I need to assign it to a variable!!
Example – my pqty function
On 7/10/06, Kevin Bednar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking to keep 2 databases in
sync, at least semi-realtime if possible, although running a batch update
every x mins wouldn't be out of the question. One db is postgres and the
other is ms-sql. It's to keep inventory in sync from 2
Please reply to all when replying on the list...On 7/10/06, Kevin Bednar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks Aron. What I'm actually trying to do is this:
Postgress in physical store, being used by POS system as the back
end. MS-SQL being used on web server by ecommerce system.
Table
Yeah, I was kind of thinking that myself. I do have control over both DB's,
and postgres does have an ODBC connector available as well. Perhaps using a
trigger to watch a temp table on each site and having it replicate to the
opposite side and then remove the record from the temp table
On 7/10/06, Kevin Bednar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Aron. What I'm actually trying to do is this:
Postgress in physical store, being used by POS system as the back end.
MS-SQL being used on web server by ecommerce system.
Table structures are different of course, but some
I have a function, the results of which seem to apply to ORDER BY and
HAVING, but not to WHERE. Is this expected?
-- Return distance in some mystery units (TODO: convert to miles or
kilometers)
CREATE FUNCTION calculate_distance(double precision, double precision,
double precision, double
Look at slony.
On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 11:06, Forums @ Existanze wrote:
We are looking for the exact thing but with two PostgreSQL databases
__
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Took
a quick glance but were running windows on both sides and it didnt look like
that would work. Didnt look real hard though.
Kevin -Original Message-From:
Scott Marlowe [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: "Forums @ Existanze"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.orgDate: Mon,
10 Jul
On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 11:25, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 11:27:52AM -0400, Kevin Bednar wrote:
Looking to keep 2 databases in sync, at least semi-realtime if possible,
although running a batch update every x mins wouldn't be out of the
question. One db is postgres and
On 7/10/06, Bryce Nesbitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a function, the results of which seem to apply to ORDER BY andHAVING, but not to WHERE.Is this expected?-- Return distance in some mystery units (TODO: convert to miles orkilometers)CREATE FUNCTION calculate_distance(double precision,
Kevin Bednar wrote:
Took a quick glance but were running windows on both sides and it didnt look
like that would work. Didnt look real hard though.
I think the to-be-released stuff is supposed to have Windows support.
They were supposed to release Real Soon Now some time ago, so I guess
they
I think there's a version with windows support due out soon. Not sure,
since I don't run windows... just remember seeing it mentioned.
On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 13:59, Kevin Bednar wrote:
Took a quick glance but were running windows on both sides and it
didnt look like that would work. Didnt look
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Marlowe
Sent: 10 July 2006 20:03
To: Kevin Bednar
Cc: Forums @ Existanze; pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] MS-SQL-Postgres sync
I think there's a version with windows support
Aaron Bono wrote:
First I recommend making your function IMMUTABLE since, given the same
arguments, it gives the same result - this will allow PostgreSQL to
optimize the function call and cache the results.
Will do!
Then, don't use 4, use calculate_distance(lat,lon,
37.789629,-122.422082).
On 7/10/06, Bryce Nesbitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is ugly also, but no other syntax seems to work:stage=# selectpod_code,lat,lon,calculate_distance(lat,lon,37.789629,-122.422082) asdist from eg_pod where dist 1 order by dist desc limit 10;
ERROR:column dist does not existSELECT
Aaron Bono wrote:
On 7/10/06, *Bryce Nesbitt* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is ugly also, but no other syntax seems to work:
stage=# select
pod_code,lat,lon,calculate_distance(lat,lon,37.789629,-122.422082) as
dist from eg_pod where dist 1
Example:
Funcation pqty(stock.code) calculates a value of 0 for a particular product. This fails the
last CASE that makes sure the pqty() value is greater than
our Usage Rate *
Review Cycle in this case is
3. But that is less than our Minimum Order Qty (First CASE) and not a multiple
of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Marlowe) writes:
On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 11:25, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 11:27:52AM -0400, Kevin Bednar wrote:
Looking to keep 2 databases in sync, at least semi-realtime if possible,
although running a batch update every x mins wouldn't be out
On 7/10/06, Bryce Nesbitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron Bono wrote: On 7/10/06, *Bryce Nesbitt* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is ugly also, but no other syntax seems to work: stage=# select pod_code,lat,lon,calculate_distance(lat,lon,37.789629,-122.422082) as dist
Bryce Nesbitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
stage=# select
pod_code,lat,lon,calculate_distance(lat,lon,37.789629,-122.422082) as
dist from eg_pod where 4 1 order by dist desc limit 10;
[ allegedly returns 10 rows ]
I'm having a real hard time believing any of this: WHERE 4 1 is
a constant FALSE
On 7/10/06, Phillip Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Example:
Funcation
pqty(stock.code) calculates a value of 0 for a particular product. This fails the
last CASE that makes sure the pqty()
value is greater than
our Usage Rate *
Review Cycle – in this case is
3. But that is less
It ties back to my other post about the FLAGS
column I need to be able to find out if the original pqty() calculation has
needed to be modified.
I guess what youre saying is to have 2
functions one that calculates the figure I have at the moment, then a second
to return the adjusted
On 7/10/06, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But as far as the underlying misconception goes, you seem to think that4 in the WHERE clause might somehow be taken as referring to thefourth SELECT result column (why you don't think that the 1 would
likewise refer to the first result column isn't
28 matches
Mail list logo
