This has been resolved -- although I still think it may be a bug in
Postgres.
I'm confused as hell, it's Friday, and it's hot though... So I'll have to
think about it over the weekend and let you know if I can make sense of it.
Thanks all for your suggestions.
Cheers,
~p
-Original Message-
T E Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, I am stalled because pg_dump fails with the following error:
> pg_dump: ERROR: timestamp out of range
> pg_dump: SQL command to dump the contents of table "server_hit_bin"
> failed: PQendcopy() failed.
You should treat this as a corrupt-data exe
Sorry, it was my fault. The setting was '%t' and a space. I fixed it and it
works well.
Many thanks !
"Michael Fuhr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 12:25:42PM +0200, Sabin Coanda wrote:
>> I'd like to check that my log_line_prefix is set to
am Thu, dem 22.02.2007, um 14:25:36 +0100 mailte A. Kretschmer folgendes:
> test=*# select * from a;
> c
> -
> {aaa,bb,c}
> {,}
> {aaa,}
> (3 rows)
>
>
> test=*# select distinct c[s] from a, generate_series(1,3)s where c[s] is not
> null;
> c
> --
> aaa
am Wed, dem 21.02.2007, um 19:21:09 +0100 mailte Sergio Andreozzi folgendes:
> Dear all,
>
> given a column which type is for instance varchar(20)[], is there any SQL
> command that let me generate the list of distinct scalar values?
>
>
> e.g.:
> col1
> row 1: (aaa, bb, c)
> row 2
am Wed, dem 21.02.2007, um 19:21:09 +0100 mailte Sergio Andreozzi folgendes:
> Dear all,
>
> given a column which type is for instance varchar(20)[], is there any SQL
> command that let me generate the list of distinct scalar values?
>
>
> e.g.:
> col1
> row 1: (aaa, bb, c)
> row 2
Apologies for cross-posting (already sent to pgadmin-support) but I am
totally stuck with this:
I run an ecommerce system on a webserver, which I want to move to a
different machine.
However, I am stalled because pg_dump fail
am Thu, dem 22.02.2007, um 12:20:12 +0100 mailte Rafa Comino folgendes:
> Hi every body
> I have this query
> SELECT 20.00::numeric(38,2)
> and postgre gives me 20, i need that postgre gives me 20.00
Works for me: (version 8.1)
test=*# SELECT 20.00::numeric(38,2);
numeric
-
20.00
(1
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 12:25:42PM +0200, Sabin Coanda wrote:
> I'd like to check that my log_line_prefix is set to '%t'.
> I suppose I can check it with the following statement:
> SELECT current_setting( 'log_line_prefix' )
> WHERE current_setting( 'log_line_prefix' ) != '%t'
>
> But it r
Hi there,
I'd like to check that my log_line_prefix is set to '%t'.
I suppose I can check it with the following statement:
SELECT current_setting( 'log_line_prefix' )
WHERE current_setting( 'log_line_prefix' ) != '%t'
But it returns every time a row, with '%t', even when log_line_prefix i
10 matches
Mail list logo