I think you should carefully read what the manual tells about PL/pgSQL
(http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/plpgsql.html) and especially about
Trapping Errors
(http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/plpgsql-control-structures.html#PLPGSQL-ERROR-TRAPPING).
>>> Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PR
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jean-David Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I turned the software compression off. It took:
>> 524487428 bytes (524 MB) copied, 125.394 seconds, 4.2 MB/s
>
>> When I let the software compression run, it uses only 30 MBytes. So whatever
>> compression it uses is very good on t
Shane Ambler wrote:
> Jean-David Beyer wrote:
>>> The physical tape speed is surely the real bottleneck here, and the
>>> fact that the total elapsed time is about the same both ways proves
>>> that about the same number of bits went onto tape both ways.
>>
>> I do not get that. If the physical t
Jean-David Beyer wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Jean-David Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I turned the software compression off. It took:
524487428 bytes (524 MB) copied, 125.394 seconds, 4.2 MB/s
When I let the software compression run, it uses only 30 MBytes. So whatever
compression it uses is ver
