On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 06:18:26PM -0800, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> I'm expecting COLUMN comments to work much like table comments, but I'm
> getting nothing back. Is this a reportable bug, or a misunderstanding?
>
> # comment on column sched.days is 'Bitmask 0=Sunday,7=Holiday, 8=School
> day, 9=Sp
Bryce Nesbitt написа:
I'm expecting COLUMN comments to work much like table comments, but I'm
getting nothing back. Is this a reportable bug, or a misunderstanding?
[...]
Misunderstanding I would say - "\dd" is for objects and they are:
'"Object" covers aggregates, functions, operators, types
2008/2/18, Bryce Nesbitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm expecting COLUMN comments to work much like table comments, but I'm
> getting nothing back. Is this a reportable bug, or a misunderstanding?
Try \d+ sched
Markus
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: d
Bryce Nesbitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm expecting COLUMN comments to work much like table comments, but I'm
> getting nothing back. Is this a reportable bug, or a misunderstanding?
> # comment on column sched.days is 'Bitmask 0=Sunday,7=Holiday, 8=School
> day, 9=Special';
> COMMENT
> # \
I'm expecting COLUMN comments to work much like table comments, but I'm
getting nothing back. Is this a reportable bug, or a misunderstanding?
# comment on column sched.days is 'Bitmask 0=Sunday,7=Holiday, 8=School
day, 9=Special';
COMMENT
# \dd sched.days;
Schema | Name | Object | Description
-
Scott Marlowe wrote:
> Does anyone who know about packaging know if this a limitation of the
> packaging spec in rpm, or is there a relatively simple way to get an
> rpm based machine to run >1 ver of pgsql at a time?
The difference is merely that the packaging doesn't support that setup.
--
Pet
Premsun Choltanwanich wrote:
> I found some information on internet about the PostgreSQL does not
> support updateable cursors so I change my code to be read only cursors as
> 'rsSystem.Open "SELECT * FROM v_memocatlist ORDER BY memocategory",
> connSystem, adOpenForwardOnly, adLockReadOnly'
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Figure out how to build ossp-uuid on Windows ...
> >
> > I think Windows has its own UUID generator, so the best bet would be to
> > make that work.
>
> Only if it can be made to present the same SQL-level API as
