Re: [SQL] exclude part of result

2008-06-26 Thread Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:49:01 -0400 (EDT) "Patricia Mitchell"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The columns (a,b,c) of the navigation table should not appear in the > result because you are only pulling records from the product and item > table. You are pulling the records out of the product and item ta

Re: [SQL] exclude part of result

2008-06-26 Thread A. Kretschmer
am Fri, dem 27.06.2008, um 0:35:38 +0100 mailte Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz folgendes: > > SELECT DISTINCT a, b, c, now(), count(item_pk) > FROM product > LEFT JOIN item ON item.product_fk = product_pk > WHERE ... > GROUP BY a, b, c > > > I have another table 'navigation' which also has the co

[SQL] exclude part of result

2008-06-26 Thread Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
SELECT DISTINCT a, b, c, now(), count(item_pk) FROM product LEFT JOIN item ON item.product_fk = product_pk WHERE ... GROUP BY a, b, c I have another table 'navigation' which also has the columns a,b,c If the combination of (a,b,c) exists in 'navigation', then exclude it from above result. How

Re: [SQL] ANSI Standard

2008-06-26 Thread Montaseri
- Try SQL 2003 standards92 is way old - You'll find that even the big boys like Oracle, DB2 etc will diverge from SQL standards if they make more $$ thier way...let alone toys like MySQL and MS-SQL Cheers Medi On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Steve Midgley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 02

Re: [SQL] ANSI Standard

2008-06-26 Thread Steve Midgley
At 02:20 AM 6/25/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:33:11 +0300 From: "Pascal Tufenkji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Subject: ANSI Standard Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi, How do I know if a function (or a certain sql syntax) in Postgres is a SQL ANSI Standard, hence it

Re: [SQL] dynamic events categorization

2008-06-26 Thread Marc Mamin
Hello, I guess that the time offsets (now-21 and now-28) are evaluated each time the corresponding condition is met. It may be faster to put them into a separate sub query. I'm not sure about putting "now" itself within the sub query... It may also be better to put your query in a procedure wher