On Monday 12. April 2010 17.37.58 Yeb Havinga wrote:
> Leif Biberg Kristensen wrote:
> > On Monday 12. April 2010 16.57.38 Rob Sargent wrote:
> >
> >> Believe me: "ego-ma-pa" will correctly define genealogical relationships
> >> (at least among humans).
> >>
> >
> > Yes, but a family tree i
Leif Biberg Kristensen wrote:
On Monday 12. April 2010 16.57.38 Rob Sargent wrote:
Believe me: "ego-ma-pa" will correctly define genealogical relationships
(at least among humans).
Yes, but a family tree is not a hierarchical tree as defined in database
theory. Believe me: I'm a genea
On Monday 12. April 2010 16.57.38 Rob Sargent wrote:
> Believe me: "ego-ma-pa" will correctly define genealogical relationships
> (at least among humans).
Yes, but a family tree is not a hierarchical tree as defined in database
theory. Believe me: I'm a genealogist.
Hint: Where is the root node
Believe me: "ego-ma-pa" will correctly define genealogical relationships
(at least among humans).
On 04/12/2010 02:14 AM, Achilleas Mantzios wrote:
> Στις Thursday 08 April 2010 17:59:01 ο/η Rob Sargent έγραψε:
>> The "parent" node in a genealogy is the mother-father tuple, so given
>> that as a s
Hi,
dense_rank() over (order by object) % 2
> Hi
> I'd like to have an alternating colorindex in the output of a query that
> consecutive rows that are the same within a colum the same number.
> The query generates a readable output from a log-table and a few others
> that hold referenc
Στις Thursday 08 April 2010 17:59:01 ο/η Rob Sargent έγραψε:
> The "parent" node in a genealogy is the mother-father tuple, so given
> that as a singularity it still fits a tree.
No, because the child and parent node would be of different schema.
>
> On 04/08/2010 12:56 AM, Achilleas Mantzios wrot
