Re: [SQL] Token separation

2012-01-20 Thread Jasen Betts
On 2012-01-16, Tim Landscheidt wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > >>> [ "0x13" is lexed as "0" then "x13" ] > >>> Is this behaviour really conforming to the standard? > >> Well, it's pretty much the universal behavior of flex-based lexers, >> anyway. A token ends when the next character can no longer se

Re: [SQL] date range to set of dates expansion

2012-01-20 Thread Gary Stainburn
On Thursday 19 January 2012 16:50:53 Steve Crawford wrote: > I'm sure most here would recommend moving to 9.1 rather than 8.4. Better > performance, cooler replication functionality, more advanced in-place > upgrade capabilities for future upgrades, a couple years longer before > end-of-life, advan