Actually got it figured...for some reason it had the function twice (o;
But with or without function index the time to query stays the same...around
110msec for 24 results...
cheers
richard
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:08:46 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Richard Klingler writes:
>> Took some time until
Richard Klingler writes:
> Took some time until I could try out this...
> But as soon I want to create the fcuntion based index it tells me:
> Error : ERROR: functions in index expression must be marked IMMUTABLE
FWIW, this example works fine for me. Maybe you have some weird
user-defined
Ok' ve got it, I've found some comment from Tom Lane on that:
"The whole custom-variable thing is being abused far beyond what the
facility was intended for, anyway. Rather than allowing variables to
spring into existence like magic, what we should have is some facility
for letting session-local v
Hello
the most similar tool in pg is "VACUUM FULL" statemet;
Regards
Pavel Stehule
2012/2/29 Rehan Saleem :
> hi ,
> how can i shrink database in postgresql here is a MS-SQL store procedure
> which shrinks the database. how same task can be achieved in postgresql.
>
> ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[sp_
hi ,
how can i shrink database in postgresql here is a MS-SQL store procedure which
shrinks the database. how same task can be achieved in postgresql.
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[sp_CleanUpDB]
AS
declare @db nvarchar(50)
select @db = db_name()
DBCC SHRINKDATABASE (@db, 10)
thanks
Hi list,
I'm using some global variables through custom_variable_classes facility.
I've recently switched from 8.1 to 9.1
and somewhere along the line the behavior of custom_variable_classes has
changed - if the variable has not been set
for a given session invoking it (SELECT current_setting('nam
