On Τετ 20 Ιουν 2012 07:08:09 Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 06/19/2012 05:17 PM, Achilleas Mantzios wrote:
> > We had another corruption incident on the very same machine, this time in
> > the jboss subsystem (a "jar cvf" produced corrupted .jar). IMHO this
> > means faulty RAM/disk.
> > If that is true,
On 06/19/2012 05:17 PM, Achilleas Mantzios wrote:
We had another corruption incident on the very same machine, this time in the jboss
subsystem (a "jar cvf" produced corrupted .jar).
IMHO this means faulty RAM/disk.
If that is true, then i guess HW sanity checks are even more important than SW
We had another corruption incident on the very same machine, this time in the
jboss subsystem (a "jar cvf" produced corrupted .jar).
IMHO this means faulty RAM/disk.
If that is true, then i guess HW sanity checks are even more important than SW
upgrades.
On Δευ 18 Ιουν 2012 11:36:14 you wrote:
>