Thanx Tom.

On Πεμ 14 Μαρ 2013 12:17:46 Tom Lane wrote:
> Achilleas Mantzios <ach...@matrix.gatewaynet.com> writes:
> > dynacom=# SELECT DISTINCT ON (qry.setid) qry.setid, qry.arragg[1:2] FROM 
> >     (select distinct sst.setid,(array_agg(vsl.name) OVER (PARTITION BY 
> > sst.setid ORDER BY character_length(vsl.name))) as arragg 
> >     FROM sissets sst, vessels vsl WHERE vsl.id=sst.vslid ORDER BY 
> > sst.setid) as qry 
> >      WHERE array_length(qry.arragg,1)>1  AND qry.setid IN (SELECT setid 
> > from sis_oper_cons) ORDER BY qry.setid,array_length(qry.arragg,1);
> > [ works ]
> 
> > however, there is not column setid in sis_oper_cons,
> 
> If not, that's a perfectly legal outer reference to qry.setid.
> 
> Probably not one of SQL's better design features, since it confuses
> people regularly; but it's required by spec to work like that.
> 
>                       regards, tom lane
> 
> 
> 
-
Achilleas Mantzios
IT DEV
IT DEPT
Dynacom Tankers Mgmt


-- 
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql

Reply via email to