On 13-08-29 9:00 AM, Luca Ferrari wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Uh, I think Vim can use etags, no? Isn't etags Exuberant Ctags? The
Exuberant Ctags's FAQ mentions Vim:
I was referring to the etags shipped with emacs, that even if does not
support (explicitly)
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Uh, I think Vim can use etags, no? Isn't etags Exuberant Ctags? The
> Exuberant Ctags's FAQ mentions Vim:
>
I was referring to the etags shipped with emacs, that even if does not
support (explicitly) sql seems to work for a very simple te
spulatkan wrote
> so following is enough to get the rows that matches regular expression
>
This is bad form even if it works. If the only point of the expression is
to filter rows it should appear in the WHERE clause. The fact that
regexp_matches(...) behaves in this way at all is, IMO, a flaw
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 08:18:03AM -0500, Charles Sheridan wrote:
>
> >>Does anyone know if there are any CTAGS extensions or variants that support
> >>PL/pgSQL ?
> >>
> >>I use exuberant-ctags which does not support it, and a web search does not
> >>return anything promising.
> >As far as I know,
Does anyone know if there are any CTAGS extensions or variants that support
PL/pgSQL ?
I use exuberant-ctags which does not support it, and a web search does not
return anything promising.
As far as I know, the quick answer is NO.
However I made a few simple tests with etags and it seems to wo
I noticed that regexp_matches already returns the rows which matches the
regular expression
now when I make a full table select query
but if I make a search with regexp_matches, it only returns rows that
matches regular expression
on pgadmin the column type is shown as text[] thus I also do no
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Charles Sheridan wrote:
> Does anyone know if there are any CTAGS extensions or variants that support
> PL/pgSQL ?
>
> I use exuberant-ctags which does not support it, and a web search does not
> return anything promising.
As far as I know, the quick answer is NO.