Re: [SQL] subquery question

2009-03-12 Thread Bob Henkel
Does this help Here is my test table data. ID;DATE;VALUE 1;2009-03-13;5 2;2009-03-13;2 3;2009-03-11;1 4;2009-03-11;2 5;2009-03-11;3 SELECT mydate AS day, SUM(CASE WHEN id % 2 = 1 THEN value END) AS sum_odd, SUM(CASE WHEN id % 2 = 0 THEN value END) AS sum_even FROM xyz GROUP BY

Re: [SQL] JOIN and aggregate problem

2009-02-20 Thread Bob Henkel
I might be missing something but does this solve your issue? CREATE TABLE t1(d INT,s INT, c INT); CREATE UNIQUE INDEX idx01_t1 ON t1 USING btree (d, s, c); INSERT INTO t1 (d, s, c) VALUES (1,1,1),(2,2,2),(3,3,3),(4,4,4); CREATE TABLE t2(d INT,s INT, c INT, x boolean); INSERT INTO t2(d, s, c,

Re: [SQL] JOIN and aggregate problem

2009-02-20 Thread Bob Henkel
Scratch this one won't work for you. On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Bob Henkel bob.hen...@gmail.com wrote: I might be missing something but does this solve your issue? CREATE TABLE t1(d INT,s INT, c INT); CREATE UNIQUE INDEX idx01_t1 ON t1 USING btree (d, s, c); INSERT INTO t1 (d, s, c

Re: [SQL] JOIN and aggregate problem

2009-02-20 Thread Bob Henkel
How about this? CREATE TABLE t1(d INT,s INT, c INT); CREATE UNIQUE INDEX idx01_t1 ON t1 USING btree (d, s, c); INSERT INTO t1 (d, s, c) VALUES (1,1,1),(2,2,2),(3,3,3),(4,4,4),(5,5,5); CREATE TABLE t2(d INT,s INT, c INT, x boolean); INSERT INTO t2(d, s, c, x) VALUES

Re: [SQL] getting count for a specific querry

2005-04-09 Thread Bob Henkel
On Apr 9, 2005 10:00 AM, John DeSoi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On Apr 8, 2005, at 3:37 PM, Joel Fradkin wrote: I don't think my clients would like me to aprox as it is a count of their records. What I plan on doing assuming I can get all my other problems fixed (as mentioned I am going to try and get

Re: [SQL] getting count for a specific querry

2005-04-08 Thread Bob Henkel
On Apr 8, 2005 1:10 PM, Scott Marlowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 12:08, Joel Fradkin wrote: Thanks all. I might have to add a button to do the count on command so they don't get the hit. I would want it to return the count of the condition, not the currently displayed number of

Re: [SQL] getting count for a specific querry

2005-04-08 Thread Bob Henkel
On Apr 8, 2005 2:23 PM, Joel Fradkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Believe me I just spent two months converting our app, I do not wish to giveup on that work. We do a great deal more then count. Specifically many ofour queries run much slower on postgres. As mentioned I purchased a 4 procbox with 8

Re: [SQL] getting count for a specific querry

2005-04-08 Thread Bob Henkel
On Apr 8, 2005 3:42 PM, Scott Marlowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 15:35, Bob Henkel wrote: On Apr 8, 2005 3:23 PM, Vivek Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Apr 8, 2005, at 3:23 PM, Joel Fradkin wrote: I set up the data on 4 10k scsi drives in a powervault and my wal on 2 15k