ese rows even though they don't need to
be?
Regards,
David
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 23 March 2004 16:17
To: David Witham
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SQL] Sorting an aggregated column
"David Witham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| y, n, y, 123, 21, 1
2 | y, y, y, 3, 2, 1
This output is correct in this case but there is no guarantee that the answers will
come out in "question" order. I can't see how to incorporate sorting by the "question"
column using this approach.
Can anyone suggest e
m I run at 1am but I don't think it
would take an hour to run. Occasionally I get this error message from the analyze job:
ERROR: simple_heap_update: tuple concurrently updated
What does this mean and should I do anything about it?
Thanks,
David Witham
Telephony Platforms Architect
Un
e.
I hope this makes sense. Does it help any?
Thanks,
David
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 18 February 2004 16:10
To: David Witham
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SQL] Indexes and statistics
"David Witham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
some
parameters to alter that?
Any suggestions appreciated.
Thanks,
David
David Witham
Telephony Platforms Architect
Unidial, Australia
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "u
magnitude too
low. However, it used the index I wanted and the >= case didn't.
Regards,
David
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 13 February 2004 16:38
To: David Witham
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SQL] Index question
"David
ndex Cond: (("day" >= '2004-01-27'::date) AND ("day" <= ('now'::text)::date))
(3 rows)
I understand that selecting count(*) will involve a scan at some stage, but I was
surprised that the index wasn't used in the >= case, but was used in the b
so it displays like this:
991234,ABC,2003-07-01,10,15,5,2003-08-01,11,17,6,2003-09-01,12,19,7
991235,XYZ,2003-07-01,13,21,8,2003-08-01,12,19,7,2003-09-01,11,17,6
(I've used commas to shorten the layout for the example)
Does anyone have some ideas on how to do this?
Thanks,
David W
Hi all,
Is there a way to do left outer joins on more than 2 tables at once (3 in my case)? Or
do I have to do the first join into a temp table and then another join from the temp
table to the third table? I can't seem to work out the syntax from the User Guide.
Thanks,
David Witham
Tele
Hi
Kumar,
You'll
need to use PL/pgSQL for your stored procedures.
When I
migrated from Informix I found it was pretty easy - just a syntactic conversion
of the procedures and a few data types to rename. The tricky bit is when you
have used a MS SQL Server concept that PostgreSQL doesn't
QL 7.3.2? I can add another
index just on prefix and get a performance increase but it's still not as
cost-efficient as using the primary index. Would it be more cost effective to do a
bunch of individual queries for each length of prefix until I find one that matches?
The average length of a prefix would probably be around 3 digits and I would need to
start at 8 digits and work back to cover all possibilities.
Thanks for any advice,
David Witham
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
Hi Chris,
You need to start a transaction explicitly:
Session 1:
buns=# begin;
BEGIN
buns=# create table test_table (col1 int);
CREATE TABLE
Session 2:
buns=# \d test_table
Did not find any relation named "test_table".
Session 1:
buns=# commit;
COMMIT
Session 2:
buns=# \d test_table
Tabl
, val3 real, val4 char);
See the SELECT reference page in the documentation.
There are other ways (which may be better) to do this that don't require the output
types to be specified with the query but this is the one I got going first so I stuck
with it. Hope this helps.
Regards,
David
Hi Abdul,
You may have lost the '' around the date specification in the to_char function when
forming the string in Java. Before submitting the query, check the contents of the
query string to make sure you still have the '' marks.
Regards,
David Witham
-Original Mess
14 matches
Mail list logo