the db ?
thx
--
-----
Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
-
Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
http://wiki.
primary database. So time critical things
are separated to own servers. It works quite fine :)
cu
--
---------
Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
-
ive me some
details about that issue ?
cu
--
---------
Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
-
Please visit the OpenSource QM Tas
the second query would be
much faster (about 2mins vs. 18mins). But I really wonder, why
is processing one huge regex so dramatically slow ?
BTW: in some tables I'm using the username instead (or parallel
to) the numerical id to skip joins against the user table. But
I'm not sure if
n views, but is this always very performant ?
cu
--
---------
Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
-
Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
ction dies ?
thx
--
-----
Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service
phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/
fax: +49 36207 519932 email: [EMAIL
it - its just some keystrokes
away for me)
cu
--
---------
Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service
phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/
fax: +49 36207 519932 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
te (AFAIK), so
we cannot intercept here. the only chance seems to leave out "INSTEAD"
and live with duplicate data.
Did I miss anyting ?
cu
--
---------
Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service
phone: +49 36207 519931
pdates within the application, but I wanna get away from that. It
probably would be interesting, if a normal application couldn't
touch the mtime at all.
cu
--
---------
Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service
phone:
yet.
Any ideas ?
thx
--
---------
Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service
phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/
fax: +49 36207 519932 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Real
SET bar = 'xyz' WHERE ...
the mtime should be set to the current time, but on
UPDATE foo SET bar = '123', mtime = '2001-09-11' WHERE ...
we shall have 9/11 as mtime.
Is this possible with rules ?
thx
--
----------
gle crashing trigger may cost a lot of money).
So I'd like to checkin only syntactically correct (also with
correct references).
Is it possible somehow ?
cu
--
---------
Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service
phone: +49
with partitions, with a
little bit more coding work, but then with better control and filtering
out unneeded stuff.
cu
--
-
Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service
phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.
hi folks,
is it possible somehow to make (AFTER) triggers run in their
own process/thread, so the calling session can return immediately
and the trigger runs in background ?
thx
--
-
Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service
--
-
Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service
phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/
fax: +49 36207 519932 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cellphone: +49 174 7066481
r idea out these ?
thx
--
-----
Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service
phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/
fax: +49 36207 519932 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cellphone: +49 1
16 matches
Mail list logo