The documentation only mentions Visual Studio 2005 and Visual Studio
2008, but I see no reason why it shouldn't work. Check out the
requirements listed in the documentation:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/interactive/install-windows-full.html
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Sofer, Yuval
You can do full-text search in postgres now using ts_vectors. I'd
recommend going that route. Doing like comparisons is not a good idea
if you don't know the first part of the string you are searching
forIt appears to be much faster from my experience to search for
ab% than it is to search
I still can't imagine why you'd ever need this...could you explain
what this does? I'm just curious now
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Kevin Crain kevin.cra...@gmail.com wrote:
This is an unfortunate situation, you shouldn't be required to do
this, the people generating your requirements
if the
information is all into a same row.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 3:28 AM, Kevin Crain kevin.cra...@gmail.com wrote:
I still can't imagine why you'd ever need this...could you explain
what this does? I'm just curious now
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Kevin Crain kevin.cra...@gmail.com
wrote
Is there any room for improvement in the data types?
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Miguel Angel Conte diaf...@gmail.com wrote:
I have the metadata in the same csv.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Kevin Crain kevin.cra...@gmail.com wrote:
How are you determining the data types
, Kevin Crain kevin.cra...@gmail.com wrote:
How are you determining the data types for these columns?
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Miguel Angel Conte diaf...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your interest. This app load scv files which change every day
(sometimes the columns too). The sizes
:
On 2011-07-06, Kevin Crain kevin.cra...@gmail.com wrote:
That's why you need to do this inside a function. Basically just make
an insert function for the table and have it calculate the count and
do the insert in one transaction.
you will still get duplicates, so include code in the function
This is an unfortunate situation, you shouldn't be required to do
this, the people generating your requirements need to be more
informed. I would make damn sure you notify the stakeholders in this
project that the data model is screwed and needs a redesign. I agree
that you should split this
You don't need a loop there. Assuming your order id field is of type
varchar you can just build the first part of your string and then do a
count to get the last part using a LIKE comparison:
select count(id_order) + 1 from sometable WHERE id_order LIKE 'O-20110704 -%';
If you do this inside a
My previous reply was intended for John.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Kevin Crain kevin.cra...@gmail.com wrote:
You don't need a loop there. Assuming your order id field is of type
varchar you can just build the first part of your string and then do a
count to get the last part using
Fabiani jo...@jfcomputer.com wrote:
On Tuesday, July 05, 2011 01:11:11 pm Kevin Crain wrote:
You don't need a loop there. Assuming your order id field is of type
varchar you can just build the first part of your string and then do a
count to get the last part using a LIKE comparison
a order by user_id, project_id, ts) AS foo group by user_id,
project_id, ts) AS day_set group by user_id, project_id, date_trunc
order by user_id, project_id, date_trunc;
-Kevin Crain
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Andreas maps...@gmx.net wrote:
hi,
I have a log-table that stores events of users
It looks like maybe he is trying to fetch records that either have no
previous entries or have another record with a timestamp 5 minutes
before them at the time they are inserted...
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Jasen Betts ja...@xnet.co.nz wrote:
On 2011-06-03, lists-pg...@useunix.net
Why is (0,20:10) listed in your expected results when there is a (0,20:08)?
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:52 PM, lists-pg...@useunix.net wrote:
I have a table that, at a minimum, has ID and timestamp columns. Records
are inserted into with random IDs and timestamps. Duplicate IDs are allowed.
My approach would be to add a column for LAST_TS and place a trigger
on insert that populates this new column. Then you have something you
can put in your WHERE clause to test on.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:52 PM, lists-pg...@useunix.net wrote:
I have a table that, at a minimum, has ID and
Will you be using a full timestamp with that or are you only concerned
about hours and minutes? If you want a full timestamp do you care
about the seconds? For example, do you want to be able to do this for
'2011-06-01 23:59:04' and '2011-06-02 00:04:04'?
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:52 PM,
Can procedural languages be used in rules? I didn't see any examples
in the documentation that suggested something like this could be done
using rules.
--Kevin Crain
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 2:21 AM, Jasen Betts ja...@xnet.co.nz wrote:
On 2011-05-27, Kevin Crain kevin.cra...@gmail.com wrote:
I
as an ordinary update, hence the error. In order to get this
to work I had to add a trigger for each child table as well to call my
update function trigger.
--Kevin Crain
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 6:40 AM, Kevin Crain kevin.cra...@gmail.com wrote:
Can procedural languages be used in rules? I didn't see any
I am trying to create a trigger on updates to a table that is
partitioned. The child tables are partitioned by month and include
checks on a timestamp field. I want the trigger on the updates to
call a function that replaces the update entirely. In order to do
this my trigger deletes the record
19 matches
Mail list logo
