Josh Berkus schrieb:
I've looked into OODBMS for my business. However, I've kept from
using any in production for one simple reason: lack of a standard.
There is no international standard for OODBMS, meaning that each
OODBMS is its own animal and databases are not at all portable between
dif
Steve Wampler schrieb:
>
> Yes, but...
>
> (1) The application I have is composed of about 50 processes
> running on 3 different OS/architectures (Linux/intel,
> Solaris/sparc, and VxWorks/ppc). The IDs I need must be
> unique across all processes (I suppose one solution would
>
Steve Wampler schrieb:
>
> Poet/Joshua Drake wrote:
> ?
> ? ?However, I also use Postgres (7.0.2) throughout this
> ? ?application and it seems cleaner to me to keep the current
> ? ?id value in a table and just use postgres to provide access
> ? ?(with a trigger function to increment the id on
