Actually got it figured...for some reason it had the function twice (o;
But with or without function index the time to query stays the same...around
110msec for 24 results...
cheers
richard
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:08:46 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Richard Klingler writes:
>> Took some t
a
> functional index on this expression.
>
> CREATE INDEX mytable_column_btrsort_idx ON mytable( btrsort(column) );
>
> this can help.
>
>
>
>
>
> 2011/12/17 Richard Klingler :
>> Morning...
>>
>> What is the fastest way to achieve natural ord
Morning...
What is the fastest way to achieve natural ordering from queries?
I found a function at:
http://2kan.tumblr.com/post/361326656/postgres-natural-ordering
But it increases the query time from around 0.4msecs to 74msecs...
Might be not much if occasional queries are made..but I use it f
%'
;
Though I just can't order the rows anymore by inet(arp.ip) anymore...
Any hints on my ordering isn't anylonger possible?
But at least the query is way faster than before (o;
2msec instead of 650msecs (o;
thanx ina dvance
richard
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 11:28:29 -0500, David Jo
Good day...
I'm trying to build a query for PGSQL 9.1 where a table has two
references with only one being used depending of the type of entry..
For example, the table has following simplified structure:
portid primary key
port2node index to table node
por