Re: [SQL] Performance of NOT IN and <> with PG 9.0.4

2011-05-27 Thread Robert Haas
he EXPLAIN ANALYZE output and try to figure out which part of the plan is being mis-estimated. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql

Re: [SQL] Performance of NOT IN and <> with PG 9.0.4

2011-05-25 Thread Robert Haas
e's only one materialize node in the whole plan. And just incidentally, do you have any of the other enable_* settings turned off? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org) To ma

Re: [SQL] Performance of NOT IN and <> with PG 9.0.4

2011-05-25 Thread Robert Haas
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote: > Hi, > found the problem. > 238 sec. with set enable_material = 'on' > 4(!) sec. with set enable_material = 'off' > > @Robert Haas: I thought it would be interesting to you, because > you've c