Hello,
I have created a trigger function to update the sort_order column of a
mapping table. I have table a that has a many to many relation ship with
table b that is mapped as a_b where a_id, and b_id are the pk columns and
there is a sort_order column. Since a_b is a mapping table there are
I suspect that if you read the spec carefully it would want a "triggered
data change violation" error raised here. My advice is not to use a
BEFORE trigger for this.
What would you recommend then. I am using Hibernate in my java application
and if the sort_order column (in this example colum
.flash_id || '''';
sort := sort +1;
END IF;
END LOOP;
END LOOP;
RETURN OLD;
END;
' language 'plpgsql';
that I will rejigger to the test table and try out.
Thanks for the input.
From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
After delete worked and the a foreach execute update seems to work best.
Below is a satisfactory test set.
-- create test table
CREATE TABLE test1 (
a int,
b int,
c int);
-- create resort function
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION resort_test1() RETURNS TRIGGER AS '
DECLARE
eachrow RECORD;
innerrow
I'm not sure if this is the best thing to do in all occasions, but I have
found a great speed increase using unions over group by.
select fkey, uid, seq2 from mytable where seq2 > 2 and seq1 = ( select
min(seq1) from mytable);
union
select fkey, uid, seq2 from mytable where seq2 > 2 and seq1 =
>> when I say
>> select * from table where id IN (2003,1342,799, 1450)
>> I would like the records to be ordered as 2003, 1342, 799, 1450.
>Just say:
>select * from table where id IN (2003,1342,799, 1450) ORDER BY id;
>If that doesn't work, you will have to be more specific and send us the
exact qu
fair enough. but a simple order by id would never work.
From: Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Russell Simpkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] ORDER records based on parameters in IN clause
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 05:57:23 -0600
On Wed, Jun
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You cannot count the number of rows in a cursor, unfortunately. I recently
ran in to this problem.
How sad, then I have to repeat the query, first for counting and last for
data fetch :-(
/BL
If you need a count, why not just execute one of the methods to get a c
16:09:37,093 WARN
[TransactionImpl] XAException: tx=TransactionImpl:XidImpl [FormatId=257,
GlobalId=dinesh//1, BranchQual=]
errorCode=XA_UNKNOWN(0)
org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.JBossLocalXAException:
Error trying to start local tx: ; - nested throwable:
(org.jb
I have created datasource but
getting this error on JBOSS startup.
Using:
PostgreSQL 8.0
JBOSS:
JBOSS-3.2.6
16:09:37,093 WARN
[TransactionImpl] XAException: tx=TransactionImpl:XidImpl [FormatId=257,
GlobalId=dinesh//1, BranchQual=]
errorCode=XA_UNKNOWN(0)
Desired Outcome(s):
* I would like to have the convenience of declaring a column that obeys
a constraint (similar to using a domain), but allows a "tidy-up" as the
value is created BEFORE asserting the constraint. This *might* be
termed a "domain trigger". (Perhaps even a WORM is possible!).
I have a perl script that issues a
series of SQL statements to perform some queries. The script works, but
I believe there must be a more elegant way to do this.
The simplified queries look like
this:
SELECT id FROM t1 WHERE
condition1; ;returns about 2k record
This is valid ddl to accomplish what you wish.
create table peoplegroups {
peopleid int not null,
groupid int not null,
primary key (peopleid, groupid),
foreign key (peopleid) references people,
foreign key (groupid) references group
}
Check the docs for other options etc.
From: "Announce" <[
You could continue with this function, with an
additional cursor to get the parameters for the function. If this is a one off
thing, that you just need to do once, you could use pg_dump to get the create
function statements and then simply alter them with an re in your favorite
editor.
Yo
- Original Message -
i've got
a strange design question to ask you.It's something I couldn't answer to
while feeling confusely it was anabsolutely BAD thing to do.For
our application, we have developed our own framework which sits ontop of
PostgreSQL. It uses object progr
Thanks Russ, but well...
It doesn't help me a lot. Our needs seem to allow that we use an id as
primary key and foreign key at the same time.
What i fear more is that it be against a good database design practice,
because leading to potential problems.
I give a clearer example :
CREATE TABLE act
16 matches
Mail list logo
