On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, ow wrote:
PostgreSQL 7.4 on i386-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC 2.96
-- about 10 records
CREATE TABLE my.Small
(
id my.dint NOT NULL,
code my.dvalue NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT pk_1 PRIMARY KEY (id),
) WITHOUT OIDS;
-- about 80M rows
CREATE TABLE my.Large
(
id
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Pragati Kenkare wrote:
I am new to postgresql. Using PostgreSQL 7.3.2, I did the following.
testdb#CREATE SEQUENCE principal_id increment 1 start 1000 cache 5;
testdb#CREATE TABLE principal (principal_id int not null, name text, constraint
pk_principal primary
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, beyaRecords - The home Urban music wrote:
Hi,
could someone please explain to me the mechanics of an UpDate:Cascade?
Delete:Cascade I fully understand but not Update. I have 2 tables A and
B. On B I have created a foreign key on user_id in both B and A for
Update and
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, Enio Schutt Junior wrote:
In a database I am working, I sometimes have to delete all the records in
some tables. According to the referential integrity defined in the creation
of the tables, postmaster should not delete the records, but it does. I have
used the following
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
Stephan Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, Enio Schutt Junior wrote:
In a database I am working, I sometimes have to delete all the records in
some tables. According to the referential integrity defined in the creation
of the tables
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Christoph Haller wrote:
Just a short question (PostgreSQL 7.3.4 on hppa-hp-hpux10.20, compiled by GCC 2.8.1)
SELECT ('' 'GDMF') ; SELECT ('GDMF' '');
?column?
--
f
(1 row)
?column?
--
t
(1 row)
Are these results standard compliant?
I
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 15:29:11 +0200,
Achilleus Mantzios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
O kyrios Bruno Wolff III egrapse stis Jan 29, 2004 :
As i see there was a thread
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2003-05/msg00762.php
dealing
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
Stephan Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd thought that I'd previously sent a message containing a set of
definitions for the reverse opclasses (not meant for inclusion to the
system because I was making SQL functions that basically did -normal
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Rajesh Kumar Mallah wrote:
can anyone explain why
SELECT array_lower(array_prepend(0, ARRAY[1,2,3]), 1);
returns 0 not 1
because
tradein_clients=# SELECT array_prepend(0, ARRAY[1,2,3]);
+---+
| array_prepend |
+---+
| {0,1,2,3} |
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
But, you will agree that result should be same JUST BEFORE and JUST AFTER
commit ( assuming no one is working on the database and i am the only user
connected.)
If you use the definition we're using now, then no, the above
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Denis wrote:
create table contact (id int constraint contact_pk primary key, name
text );
create table address (id int constraint address_fk references contact(id) on
delete cascade initially deferred,
city text,
pin text);
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003, pginfo wrote:
Hi,
I am using pg 7.4.
Pls, see this test:
tt07=# update a_cars set dog_or_free=0 where virtualen=0 and
dog_or_free=4 and ids NOT IN ( select oc.ids_car_real from a_oferti_cars
oc,a_oferti o where oc.IDS_oferti=o.ids and o.date_valid=9964) AND
IDS =
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I've got to be missing something obvious here ... I have two tables, on
containing traffic stats, the other disk usage ... I want to do a JOIN in
one query to give me the sum of traffic and average of storage ...
seperately, the results are right
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Iain wrote:
T've been following this thread with interest because I have a related
problem. Basically we are storing dates in CHAR fields with al the
associated problems. I'd like to do it, but changing everything to date
fields isn't practical for now, so as a stopgap
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, ow wrote:
Am trying to find duplicate values in a large table (about 80M records).
Somehow, none of the two (2) queries (see below) is using the index I_bca
that, I believe, should've been used.
As a side note, to help determine if it should be used, you probably want
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, FET wrote:
Hi everybody,
I have a stored procedure that drops table A and then creates table A
again. The table A has no constraints on any columns. When I execute
the stored procedure by saying: SELECT sp_myproc(); It gives me an
error saying : Relation 68428 does not
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
nobody wrote:
I have found it in documentation, it is single quote. But it does not
explain why
SELECT '1/11/2003' AS InvoiceDate;
returns unknown data type instead of date.
(I haven't seen the original message yet, so I'm replying to a
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Jim Drummey wrote:
Hello-
The 7.2 version distributed with RedHat 8.0 seems not
to work for substrings and POSIX regular expressions.
I think this should work
pds= select substring( str1 from ',' ) from address;
ERROR: pg_atoi: error in ,: can't parse ,
Am I
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Tomasz Myrta wrote:
I've got some tables defined as:
create table xx (
some_column references master_table
It means this column is defined by default:
NOT DEFERRABLE, INITIALLY IMMEDIATE
I tried replacing rows in this table by new ones as:
set autocommit=off;
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Yasir Malik wrote:
Thank you for your reply.
select int4(b'1001')::bit(32); gives the same result as what you gave.
select int4(b'1001')::bit(4); gives the upper four bits, which are all
zeroes. How would I get the lower four bits? I building bitmaps using
plpgsql, and
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Yasir Malik wrote:
I think I am almost at a solution to my last question. I can do
select int4(a) from test;
to convert to an integer. So now addition and
subtraction can be done between bit types. But how do I convert back to
BIT type? If I do
select
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Kumar wrote:
select now()+ interval'1 month'; -- This is working fine.
I wanna dynamically assign the interval number. i,e -- select now()+
interval'n month';
If n is an integer, I'd suggest something like
select now() + n * interval '1 month';
rather than messing
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, ow wrote:
--- Stephan Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure that AK_abc is the best index for check a range on a and
single values on b and c. I'd think that something like an index
on (b,c,a) would probably be better for this purpose (without doing any
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whenever an error occurs within the transaction, PostgreSQL puts the
whole transaction in an *ABORT* state, so that there is no difference at
all between COMMITing or ROLLBACKing it. Even commands successfully
carried out before the error ocurred
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, ow wrote:
Postgresql 7.4.rc1 on i686 pc linux compiled by gcc 2.06.
All configuration settings are default.
Hi,
Trying to find a way to improve range query performance.
The table Test has about 30 million records.
-- DLong, Dtimestamp, Dint, etc are domains of the
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Michele Bendazzoli wrote:
I have found a strange behaviour that I don't know if is a bug or not.
I have three tables:
* abilitazione with a primary key of (comuneid, cassonettoid, chiaveid)
* cassonetto with a primary key of (comuneid, cassonettoid)
* chiave with a
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Gary Stainburn wrote:
Hi folks,
don't know if it's cos of the 17 hours I've just worked (sympathy vote please)
but I can't get this one worked out
I've got table names with nid as name id field and nallowfollow flag.
I've got a vehicles table with vowner pointing at
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, sad wrote:
Good day.
AFAIK PostgreSQL provides the type TEXT with 4-byte prefix length
which is distinct to C's zero-terminated (char *)
That's very good.
Then I expect natural possibility to store texts having zero characters.
If you want to store zero characters (or
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
heute := ''today'';
Select Into vk ourcolumn From table where other = foo;
If vk 0 Then
vk_txt := ''Vorkuehlung notwendig'';
ez := heute + interval ''vk days'';
PL/pgSQL handles variable like SQL, not like PHP or Perl. You can't
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
UPDATE commit_log_ports_elements X
IIRC, PostgreSQL doesn't like aliases of the
update table, so I think you'll need to spell it
out in the WHERE.
SET X.needs_refresh = CLP.needs_refresh,
X.port_version = CLP.port_version,
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, CN wrote:
I am trying to explain the meaning of tables and views:
The tables in the first SELECT in the UNION of view1 are jorunal, whose
rows are entered daily.
The table in the second SELECT in the UNION of view1 is budget, whose
rows use year+month as key.
View1
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, CN wrote:
Peter, Thanks a lot!
Unqualified count() cannot use an index because it has to visit all the
rows in the table.
It is only for my test. In my real practice, queries like
SELECT * FROM view1 WHERE year = 2003 AND month BETWEEN 10 AND 12
will be performed.
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, CN wrote:
You do realize that extract returns a double precision value not an
integer, and it's probably not going to be willing to push clauses down
through the union where the types are different .
Argh! I didn't noticed that. Thanks for the reminder.
Let's do
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, GRIMOIS Eric wrote:
Hi
I have a problem with SRF functions on a RedHat 8.0 system with PostgreSQL
7.3.2.
Schema is following :
CREATE TABLE public.agents (
numero_age int4 NOT NULL,
nom_age varchar(30) NOT NULL,
prenom_age varchar(30) NOT NULL,
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, GRIMOIS Eric wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, GRIMOIS Eric wrote:
CREATE TABLE public.agents (
numero_age int4 NOT NULL,
nom_age varchar(30) NOT NULL,
prenom_age varchar(30) NOT NULL,
date_entree_age date NOT NULL,
identite varchar(50),
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, George A.J wrote:
The main problems i am facing is that in sql server the text comparisons
are case insensitive. how can i compare text case insensitive in
postgresql without using an upper() or lower() function in both sides
(=). Is there any option to set in
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Kumar wrote:
Dear Friends,
I am using Postgres 7.3.4 on Linux server 7.3.
I wanted to update one column of my table with now() or timestamp. And I want that
timestamp of format
2003-09-19 18:39:08.13
I think select CAST(CURRENT_TIMESTAMP(0)
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Stephan Szabo wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Kumar wrote:
Dear Friends,
I am using Postgres 7.3.4 on Linux server 7.3.
I wanted to update one column of my table with now() or timestamp. And I want that
timestamp of format
2003-09-19
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, tom baker wrote:
ah, yes, i DID not see the NOT. that is fixed. here is the code that is having
problems (paired down; all error checking has been removed!)
$res=pg_query( BEGIN TRANSACTION ) ;
$sql = LOCK TABLE parts IN SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE MODE ;
$res = pg_query( $sql
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, tom baker wrote:
i am (probably) shooting myself in the foot, but here goes the question.
inside of a begin transaction/commit block, i am attempting to insert a record
into a parts table, and then insert a record that references the part into an
application table. and
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Richard Sydney-Smith wrote:
I have a number of sybase procedures in which I use something like
declare
mx : integer;
begin
select max(field) from table into mx;
return mx;
end;
Postgresql is telling me that select...into has not been implemented
yet. what is the
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, Dan Langille wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm playing with SETOF on functions. But I can't get the return type
correct. What have I missed? A cast?
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION elementGet (text) RETURNS SETOF
element_type AS '
select 1,
\'test\',
\'F\'
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, ProgHome wrote:
You were right, Stephan !
The query below is still not correct ... because the second line
shouldn't be shown !
Now I really don't know how I could rewrite this without a subquery
because it doesn't seem to be possible with some LEFT or INNER joins !
Do
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Kumar wrote:
Dear Friends,
I am newbie to Postgres. I am running 7.3.4 on Linux 7.3. I am using
Pgadmin tool. I need to return the table rows via record set.
Create table t1 (c1 int, c2 varchar, c3 varchar);
Create or Replace function sel_t1 () returns setof records
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
How can I join on one table with join conditions refering to two tables? In this
example
p is missing an entry that corresponds to u. I want to select from u and p, but have
entries in u that don't have an entry in p. The problem is I need to
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Michele Bendazzoli wrote:
I think i found a bug in PL/PGSQL: when i use a parameter bigint (int8)
and call the function from psql an error message which says that the
functioname(bigint) doesn't exist is displayed.
If i turn the int8 to int4 all works fine ...
I can't
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
Guys:
Contributing could be that the table holding the deleted records is a child
table with an ON CASCADE DELETE of one of the tables being updated
elsewhere in the function. And the function works if called by the owner of
the table (and the
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Stuart wrote:
Folks,
I was wandering if there was a feasible way to automatically update a field
in a table, say 'revision_date' in a record whenever any other field in the
record is changed. My attempts to use a trigger caused repeating loops and
bombed with
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Dani Oderbolz wrote:
Stephan Szabo wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Rod Taylor wrote:
...
Is the temp table version any faster? I realize it has a higher limit
to the number of items you can have in the list.
Within the scope of the new hashed IN stuff I believe
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Mike Winter wrote:
I'm sure many on this list are sick of hearing about this problem, but it
was on the fix list for 7.4, but doesn't appear to have been changed.
IN (subselect) was changed for 7.4 (although I'm not sure of the list
mentions the difference). I don't know
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Rod Taylor wrote:
Thanks, Stephan. I was really hoping that the IN(valuelist) was going to
be changed at the same time, because it really is unusable for anything
over a couple of thousand values.
Changed to do what?
One possibility might be to act as if the
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Rod Taylor wrote:
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 17:41, Stephan Szabo wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Rod Taylor wrote:
Thanks, Stephan. I was really hoping that the IN(valuelist) was going to
be changed at the same time, because it really is unusable for anything
over
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Slawek Jarosz wrote:
Hi,
I trying to write a query that will join 2 tables. Here's the concept:
Table 1: table1, primary key pk1 Table 2: table2, primary key pk2
One of the fields (f2) in table2 contains either the primary key of
table1 or a NULL value. So
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, BenLaKnet wrote:
we make a dump before ... and with a product pgmanager (ems tech) we do
not show any foreign keys.
That's possible, I'd have guessed that it should be dumping the triggers
as CREATE CONSTRAINT TRIGGER commands in the dump.
But I think all of triggers of
that is not equal to 21101.
-Original Message-
From: Stephan Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 1:10 PM
To: Franco Bruno Borghesi
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SQL] How to optimize this query ?
On 13 Aug 2003, Franco Bruno
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Franco Bruno Borghesi wrote:
I *guess* this query does the same as yours (please verify).
It does not in general unfortunately. :( I see two possible
problems.
The first is that by using an inner join you're going to lose
any rows where there is no match on the right hand
On 13 Aug 2003, Franco Bruno Borghesi wrote:
Maybe its better now. Anyway, what I think is that joining will perform
better than using IN. Am I wrong?
Generally that's true (for 7.3 and earlier). For 7.4 IN has gotten much
better, and you probably want to retry with IN. However, it's
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Abdul Wahab Dahalan wrote:
Hai Chris!
Thanks for the solution but seem it doesnt work.
(0 rows) returned when I used NOT EXITS but (4 rows) returned
when NOT IN is used...
Maybe you need a set of parenthesis around the old conditions
because of the or.
On 12 Aug 2003, krysto wrote:
Hi all
I have to optmize this query, because it takes a while to run (about
30s)
Here are the tables (with the keys):
affiliate_lockout (6 rows) (member_id, affiliate_id)
lead (4490 rows) (id, ...)
member (6 rows) (id, ...)
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, ProgHome wrote:
select member.id, automated.delivery, member.email
from (automated INNER JOIN member ON member.id = automated.member_id)
where activated=1
and website='$SITE_NAME'
and (select count(*) from trans_member where
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Gregory S. Williamson wrote:
I am obviuously doing some newbie trick, and I ordinarily would spend time browing
the archives, but the archives.postgresql.org site seems to be absurdly slow.
This is 7.3.3 on a linux box.
I have a bunch of data with state, city, county
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Gary Stainburn wrote:
I don;t know if it's cos it's Monday or what, but I can't see what's wrong
here.
I've got two tables, turns which holds a turn number, a task, and where
appropriate a link to a loco. The select below works but only shows those
tasks where a loco
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Raymond Chui wrote:
Here are the simple things I did
create table state (
state_code char(2) not null,
state varchar(15) not null,
primary key (state_code)
);
create table whitepage (
user_id char(8) not null,
email varchar(50),
telephone
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Jie Liang wrote:
1. No doc said % should escape by %%, and
select replace('whatever%20sites','%20','%%20') won't work also.
2. v7.3.2 haven't resolved this problem yet, I am not sure the later version.
I seem to get the expected results on my 7.3.4 system.
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, BenLaKnet wrote:
When I duplicate this code in an other table named spectacle_v without
Foreygn key ... all is running.
But when I try to delete a spectacle_membre, linked value in spectacle
are correctly deleted, but I have an error for spectacle_v which is not
linked :
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, eVl One wrote:
Hello, Bruno.
You wrote 9 08 2003, 18:08:09:
BWI On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 11:17:56 +0300,
BWI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please help.
Need a boolean function which returns true if given key in table is
referensed from another table(s).
BWI Use
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Anagha Joshi wrote:
Hi All,
I'm using PG-7.2.4 on Solaries.
When I do:
template1=# select time(6576);
ERROR: TIME(6576) precision must be between 0 and 13
Where am I wrong?
IIRC time(n) refers to the type time with a precision of n
and n is limited as stated by the
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Jamie Lawrence wrote:
I have a view:
create or replace view addenda as
select
documents.id,
documents.oid,
documents.projects_id,
documents.doc_num,
documents.description,
documents.date,
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Oliver Duke-Williams wrote:
I'd like to have a table in which one column has an integrity reference
to another column within the same table, and for updates to the primary
column to be cascaded. The former aspect seems to work OK, but the
latter does not.
I think you
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Elielson Fontanezi wrote:
First of all, my envoronment is:
Linux netlab142.prodam 2.4.8-26mdk #1 Sun Sep 23 17:06:39 CEST 2001
i686 unknown
pg_ctl (PostgreSQL) 7.2.1
I would like some suggestions on how to speed up a query.
Both of the
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Elielson Fontanezi wrote:
What can I do in this case?
I could not found anything about iscachable.
postgres$ cat in.sql
create index bt_proposta_f01 on proposta
using btree (func_cod_secretaria(nr_proponente));
postgres$ psql -d escola -f in.sql
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Stephan Szabo wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Elielson Fontanezi wrote:
What can I do in this case?
I could not found anything about iscachable.
postgres$ cat in.sql
create index bt_proposta_f01 on proposta
using btree (func_cod_secretaria(nr_proponente
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Elielson Fontanezi wrote:
Who can help me on that?
First of all, my envoronment is:
Linux netlab142.prodam 2.4.8-26mdk #1 Sun Sep 23 17:06:39 CEST 2001
i686 unknown
pg_ctl (PostgreSQL) 7.2.
You should definately move to the highest 7.2 release
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Well, my 2 cents is that though we consider NULL when ordering via ORDER
BY, we ignore it in MAX because it really isn't a value, and NaN seems
to be similar to NULL.
When doing ORDER BY, we have to put the NULL value somewhere, so we put
it at the
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
Michael S. Tibbetts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd expect the aggregate function min() to return the minimum, valid
numeric value. Instead, it seems to return the minimum value from the
subset of rows following the 'NaN'.
Not real surprising given
On 15 Jul 2003, Lauren Matheson wrote:
Hello,
I am having difficulty setting an on update rule which seems to be
caught in a recursive loop.
Context is a table with three columns assigning users to groups with the
third column being boolean to flag the primary group. I would like to
set
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Michael S. Tibbetts wrote:
Hi,
I have a table containing a double precision column. That column
contains at least one judiciously placed NaN.
I'd expect the aggregate function min() to return the minimum, valid
numeric value. Instead, it seems to return the minimum
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Vijay Kumar wrote:
Hi,
We are using postgresql 7.3.3, we are encountering the following problems when we
used temporary tables.
Here with i'm sending my Sample function.
create or replace function TestTemp_refcur(refcursor) returns refcursor As '
declare
refc alias
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
I'm debugging a trigger in plpgsql and for some reason or the select
into var does not seem to work. Here is an unaltered snippet of my
trigger code:
raise notice ''this id : %'',NEW.id;
select into i_hierarchy_id
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, Terence Kearns wrote:
CREATE FUNCTION base.fn_fkey_check(text, text, int4) RETURNS bool AS
'DECLARE
BEGIN
RETURN (SELECT count($1) FROM $2 where $1 = $3)::bool;
END;'
LANGUAGE 'sql';
produces this error
ERROR: parser: parse error at or near RETURN at character
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Matt Tenenbaum wrote:
Say I created a couple tables A and B, where A contains a column p
which B references as a foreign key. Further say that, when I created
these tables, I meant to specify 'on delete cascade' for p in the
definition of B but didn't. What's the proper
On 7 Jul 2003, markus brosch wrote:
I was searching the archive and was wondering why nobody asked this
strange(!) question (or I've not found it?):
What is the max allowed length of a sql statement or query?
AFAIR in recent versions it's effectively limited only by resources (how
much
On 8 Jul 2003, Markus Bertheau wrote:
when you have
select expensive_expression(column), * from table offset 20 limit 40
can you somehow save the cost for the first 20 calculations of
expensive_expression?
Right now the only way I can think of that might work is to push the
offset/limit
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Erik Erkelens wrote:
new_max_records ALIAS FOR $1;
BEGIN
DROP SEQUENCE my_sequence;
--CREATE SEQUENCE my_sequence MAXVALUE 4
CYCLE;
CREATE SEQUENCE my_sequence MAXVALUE
new_max_records CYCLE;
Most of the creates/drops/etc... don't
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Anagha Joshi wrote:
4. the file '2078989' corresponds to 'cdrrec' file (table)
$ ls -l 2078989
-rw--- 1 postgres postgres 2359296 Jun 24 17:18 2078989
This means table 'cdrrec' takes approx. 2030.2626953125 KB i.e. approx.
2MB
Table is like this:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Tony G. Harris wrote:
Hello. I'm using PostgreSQL to learn SQL and SQL-based languages. The
text I'm using (SAMS Teach Yourself SQL in 21 Days, 3rd.ed.) references
Oracle in its examples, though I can usually get PostgreSQL to work
almost as well.
Well, I'm almost to
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Demidem Mohamed Amine wrote:
hello,
Can anyone help me create a function that creates a
table, in this way for example :
See EXECUTE for a way to execute a query that you've built into
a string, for example, something like:
EXECUTE ''create table '' || $1 || '' (id
On 12 Jun 2003, Robert Treat wrote:
Does anyone know if there is support for IF x OR y THEN syntax in
plpgsql? The docs just say IF [boolean expression] then. which loosely
interpreted could allow for an OR, but I couldn't seem to get it to
work. TIA,
Can you give a full example of what
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Ludwig Lim wrote:
I would like to ask the following questions:
a) Are foreign key constraint triggers guaranteed to
execute first before any ordinary BEFORE
INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE trigger is executed? (This is
assuming that the foreign keys are declared as NOT
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Richard Huxton wrote:
On Thursday 05 Jun 2003 3:55 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi ,
Is there any way to enforce fkeys only on subset of
the table something on the lines of unique partial indexes
I'm afraid not (AFAIK). What might be a solution in your case is to
On Fri, 30 May 2003, jtx wrote:
Hi everyone, I'm trying to do a left join on two tables, mainly because
data from table 'b' (lists) may or may not exist, and if it doesn't I
want results. However, if data from table lists DOES exist, I want to
run a conditional on it, and then return data
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Brian Knox wrote:
Given a variable of the record data type in pl/pgsql, is it possible to
get the names of the columns ( attributes ) of that record?
eg, given record NEW for table foo, is there a way to get information
concerning the columns that make up that record?
On Mon, 12 May 2003, Didrik Pinte wrote:
Here is the query :
SELECT profiles_et.username, profiles_et.name, profiles_et.firstname,
profiles_et.email, company_et.name AS company, count(logs_et.dt) AS cnt,
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Claude wrote:
I have a table a field with timestamps in seconds since epoch and I would
like to get a human readable date... but it seems that postgresql 7.3 does
not support the datetime(), timestamp(), timestamptz() functions...
I'd say probably something like:
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
Stephan Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 26 Mar 2003, Greg Stark wrote:
Can you show an example where the join order would affect the result set? I
can't think of any.
I can think of a few somewhat degenerate cases.
I don't think you need
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Natasa Bulatovic wrote:
Select statement returns as a result concatenated all varchar, text
and char columns of a table as one single column ...
select col1||col2||col3||.||col100 from table
However, when the number of concatenated columns is bigger than 22 no
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Grignon Etienne wrote:
test=# SELECT createuser('toto', true, true, true);
NOTICE: Begin Of Update Permissions
NOTICE: End Of Update Permissions
NOTICE: TRIGGER
createuser
0
(1 row)
test=#
My problem is that the trigger for the insert
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Rudi Starcevic wrote:
I'm trying to create this table with a Check that fails.
I'm using 'Check' instead of 'References' due to poor db schema ( before
me .. )
Here is my error message:
ERROR: cannot use subselect in CHECK constraint expression
CREATE TABLE
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
Dan Langille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is the query in question:
SELECT element_id as wle_element_id, COUNT(watch_list_id)
FROM watch_list JOIN watch_list_element
ON watch_list.id = watch_list_element.watch_list_id
WHERE
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
Stephan Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
Anyone care to offer a gloss on the spec to prove that this behavior
is correct or not correct?
Hmm, I'd read SQL92 Section 7.5 (joined tables) Syntax Rules as saying
201 - 300 of 624 matches
Mail list logo
