On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 09:57:08 +0530
Robins Tharakan robins.thara...@comodo.com wrote:
On 11/08/2011 02:50 AM, Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz wrote:
Hello,
I would like to GROUP the result by one column and ORDER it by
another:
SELECT
no, name, similarity(name, 'Tooneyvara') AS s
FROM
,
similarity(name, 'Tooneyvara') AS sim
FROM vtown
WHERE similarity(name, 'Tooneyvara') 0.4
ORDER BY no, sim DESC
) AS x
ORDER BY sim
Is that the best way to achieve this result?
--
Best Regards,
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
--
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
varying(3) NOT NULL,
id serial NOT NULL,
name character varying(50) NOT NULL,
source character varying(2) NOT NULL
)
--
Best Regards,
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
--
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref
On Fri, 27 May 2011 12:28:51 -0700
Kevin Crain kevin.cra...@gmail.com wrote:
Is the order of evaluation for the trigger causing this error?
Are you aware that triggers are executed in alphabetical order?
I simply used RAISE to check the order of execution of my triggers:
RAISE NOTICE '% % % %:
On Thu, 26 May 2011 10:15:50 +1200
Andrej andrej.gro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 May 2011 09:13, Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
postgres...@numerixtechnology.de wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2011 09:25:48 -0600
Rob Sargent robjsarg...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/24/2011 10:57 AM, Lew wrote:
Tarlika Elisabeth
On Tue, 24 May 2011 12:57:57 -0400
Lew no...@lewscanon.com wrote:
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz wrote:
this was just a TEMPORARY table I created for quick analysis
of my CSV data (now renamed to temp_person).
Ah, yes, that makes much more sense. Temporary tables such as you
describe can be very
On Wed, 25 May 2011 09:25:48 -0600
Rob Sargent robjsarg...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/24/2011 10:57 AM, Lew wrote:
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz wrote:
CREATE TABLE person
(
id integer NOT NULL,
name character varying(256) NOT NULL,
location character varying(256),
CONSTRAINT person_pkey
(country)
REFERENCES country (id) MATCH SIMPLE
ON UPDATE CASCADE ON DELETE RESTRICT,
CONSTRAINT county_person_fk FOREIGN KEY (country, county)
REFERENCES county (country, code) MATCH SIMPLE
ON UPDATE NO ACTION ON DELETE NO ACTION,
);
--
Best Regards,
Tarlika Elisabeth
On Mon, 23 May 2011 13:11:24 +1200
Andrej andrej.gro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 May 2011 10:00, Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
postgres...@numerixtechnology.de wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2011 21:05:26 +0100
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz postgres...@numerixtechnology.de wrote:
A column contains location
(country, code),
CONSTRAINT country_region_fk FOREIGN KEY (country)
REFERENCES country (id) MATCH SIMPLE
ON UPDATE CASCADE ON DELETE RESTRICT
)
=
System: PostgreSQL 8.4
--
Best Regards,
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
--
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org)
To make
On Sun, 22 May 2011 21:05:26 +0100
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz postgres...@numerixtechnology.de wrote:
A column contains location information, which may contain any of the
following:
1) null
2) country name (e.g. France)
3) city name, region name (e.g. Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen)
4) city name, Rg
I wrote a trigger function to convert inserts into updates if the
record exists already.
- I am not using rules because the table is populated via COPY.
- I am employing a two-stage process (PERFORM, then UPDATE) because
the update trigger might decide not to update after all, and therefore
FOUND
then
insert into manager(name) values (NEW.manager_name);
select into id_manager CURRVAL('manager_id_seq');
end if;
INSERT INTO athlete (... manager_fk...) VALUES ( ... id_manager...);
good luck!
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
postgres...@numerixtechnology.de wrote
On Wed, 4 May 2011 23:48:04 +0100
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz postgres...@numerixtechnology.de wrote:
I have got a database that needs to be populated, first with historical
data, then on a daily basis.[...]
Once imported, data will neither be modified nor deleted.
Data come in denormalized CSV
Thank you for your help, Sergey. That certainly works.
I was wondering whether the manager.id could maybe be obtained via
INSERT ... RETURNING?
--
Best Regards,
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
On Thu, 5 May 2011 08:45:32 +0300
sergey kapustin kapustin.ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Try using (select
horse ADD CONSTRAINT val_horse_stats
CHECK (sex != 'f') OR (stats IS NULL));
--
Best Regards,
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
--
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql
, NEW.dad_id,
NEW.sponsor_id, ?, NEW._received);
)
System: PostgreSQL 8.3
no of users: 1
--
Best Regards,
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
--
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql
- it's always a set of events at one location spaced about 30min apart
- the imported data are chained (have a link to previous/next event)
Have you got any idea how I could tackle this problem
--
Best Regards,
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
--
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 08:21:47 +1300
Andrej andrej.gro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 February 2011 07:14, Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
postgres...@numerixtechnology.de wrote:
From the date and time I want to create a timestamp.
I know that
- the events take place during the day, say between 10:30 and 22
On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 18:38:44 -
Oliveiros d'Azevedo Cristina oliveiros.crist...@marktest.pt wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz postgres...@numerixtechnology.de
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 6:14 PM
Subject: [SQL] data import: 12
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 22:22:11 -0500
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz postgres...@numerixtechnology.de writes:
The following command works fine when pasing it to psql via the -c
option:
cat event.csv | \
psql -c COPY (event_id, event_name) FROM STDIN DELIMITER
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 12:01:35 +
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz postgres...@numerixtechnology.de wrote:
I'd like the store the COPY command in a separate file without
specifying an input file name. I want to feed it the data from the
shell script that calls psql
STDIN: All rows are read from
STDIN DELIMITER AS ',' NULL AS ''
cat event.csv | psql -f event.sql
What's the problem? Many thanks in advance.
--
Best Regards,
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
--
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:40:03 +0200
Andreas Schmitz mailingl...@longimanus.net wrote:
On 09/28/2010 10:36 PM, Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz wrote:
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:34:31 +0100
Oliveiros d'Azevedo Cristinaoliveiros.crist...@marktest.pt
wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Tarlika
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:34:31 +0100
Oliveiros d'Azevedo Cristina oliveiros.crist...@marktest.pt wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz postgre...@numerixtechnology.de
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 5:54 PM
Subject: Re: [SQL] identifying
BY trainer_name-- the field you want to test for
duplicates
HAVING (COUNT(*) 1)
) z
NATURAL JOIN student y
What indices would you recommend for this operation?
--
Best Regards,
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
--
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org)
To make changes
Dear Oliveiros,
Thank you for taking the time to help.
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:22:21 +0100
Oliveiros d'Azevedo Cristina oliveiros.crist...@marktest.pt wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz postgre...@numerixtechnology.de
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Sent: Thursday
quite upset about it!
It took me a while to get my head round your outer query with the
NATURAL JOIN between the student table and the nested query results. I
have done table joins before but this solution would not have sprung to
mind.
--
Many thanks,
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
--
Sent via
on (trainer_id,trainer_name)
trainer_id as id,
trainer_name as name from student
) as trainer
group by trainer.id
having count (trainer.name) 1
)
) as y
order by trainer_id
--
Best Regards,
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
--
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:15:09 -0800 (PST)
Stephan Szabo ssz...@megazone.bigpanda.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz wrote:
I have 2 tables T1 and T2
T1 has the columns: D, S, C. The combination of D,S,C is unique.
T2 has the columns: D, S, C, and boolean X
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:06:48 +
Richard Huxton d...@archonet.com wrote:
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz wrote:
I have 2 tables T1 and T2
T1 has the columns: D, S, C. The combination of D,S,C is unique.
T2 has the columns: D, S, C, and boolean X. The combination of
D,S,C is not unique
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:44:05 +
Richard Huxton d...@archonet.com wrote:
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:06:48 +
Richard Huxton d...@archonet.com wrote:
try something like:
SELECT t1.d, t1.s, t1.c, count(*)
FROM t1
LEFT JOIN (
SELECT d,s,c FROM t2
combinations in T2 where X = true.
There might be no matching pair in T2 or there might be match but X
is false.
How can I express this?
--
Best Regards,
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
--
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http
with this statement: 'select a,b,c, count()from product LEFT
JOIN item on'
P.M.
--- On Thu 06/26, Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:35
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:33:07 +0200
Harald Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PRODUCT table :
A B C
100 200 300
100 200 301
100 205 300
100 205 301
NAVIGATION table
A B C #ITEMS
100 200 300 5
where t2.a =
t1.a and t2.b = t1.b and t2.c = t1.c)
Many thanks - there seems to be half a dozen ways of achieving the
desired result!
--- On Thu, 6/26/08, Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Tarlika Elisabeth
Schmitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SQL] exclude part
of result
can I achieve this?
--
Best Regards,
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
A: Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q: Why is top posting bad?
--
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql
|| section.id as x
FROM item
LEFT JOIN product ON ...
LEFT JOIN department ON ...
LEFT JOIN section ON ...
SELECT
item.id
department.id as x
FROM item
LEFT JOIN product ON ...
LEFT JOIN department ON ...
--
Best Regards,
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
A: Because it breaks the logical
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 09:55:46 +0200
A. Kretschmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
am Wed, dem 04.06.2008, um 8:41:29 +0100 mailte Tarlika Elisabeth
Schmitz folgendes:
I have 3 similar SELECTs. I am wondering whether they could be
rolled into one?
SELECT
item.id,
department.id
' AND ...
)
Is this the most efficient way of doing this?
Is there a limit to the number of results that IN can cope with?
This needs to run on Postgres 7.4.
--
Best Regards,
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
A: Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q: Why is top posting bad?
--
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing
40 matches
Mail list logo
