Re: [SQL] Re: Argument variables for select

2000-08-29 Thread hlefebvre
Keith Wong wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > I've worked with MS SQL stored procedures before and they are quite > powerful. Its a shame postgres doesn't have the same > level of features as offered by MS SQL, MS SQL is based on source code of Sybase v5. MS bought this source code to sybase. Sybase

Re: [SQL] Re: Date of creation and of change

2000-08-25 Thread hlefebvre
Andreas Tille wrote: > > On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Tom Lane wrote: > > > I think you are getting burnt by premature constant folding --- see > > nearby discussion of how to define a column default that gives the > > time of insertion. You need to write this as > > NEW.ChangedAt := now(); > >

Re: [SQL] Re: Date of creation and of change

2000-08-25 Thread hlefebvre
Tom Lane wrote: > > Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> NEW.ChangedAt := timestamp(''now''); > > > This avoids the error message, but doesn't have any effect to the value > > of ChangedAt. It just remains the same as CreatedAt :-(. > > I think you are getting burnt by premature co

Re: [SQL] Re: Date of creation and of change

2000-08-25 Thread hlefebvre
Andreas Tille wrote: > > On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, hlefebvre wrote: > > > No I suppose that the problem is the identifier "changedat" is unknown. > > > > You must probably prefix it : NEW.changedat > > > > CREATE FUNCTION changed_

Re: [SQL] Re: Date of creation and of change

2000-08-25 Thread hlefebvre
Andreas Tille wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, hlefebvre wrote: > > > Yes. The keywords NEW / OLD are available only in triggers > > see > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.0/user/c40874113.htm#AEN4286 > Well, I believe that, but > >

Re: [SQL] Create table in functions

2000-08-24 Thread hlefebvre
Andreas Tille wrote: > What does this mean? The ERROR is caused by the Create Table statement > (when I removed it from my complex function it worked well). > So why doesn't this work and what copy function fails here?? Maybe you can create your table using a select into statement : something l

Re: [SQL] Re: Date of creation and of change

2000-08-23 Thread hlefebvre
Andreas Tille wrote: > I tried: > > web=# CREATE FUNCTION changed_at_timestamp () RETURNS OPAQUE AS ' > web'# BEGIN > web'# ChangeDate := timestamp(''now''); > web'# RETURN NEW; > web'# END; > web'# ' LANGUAGE 'plpgsql'; > CREATE > web=# select changed_at_timestamp () ;

Re: [SQL] Using SETOF in plpgsql function

2000-08-23 Thread hlefebvre
Graham Vickrage wrote: > > As far as i know, you can only return single values from functions at the > moment. > > Regards > > Graham Hum, this is possible a least in SQL functions. But maybe impossible in PL/PGSQL

Re: [SQL] Date of creation and of change

2000-08-23 Thread hlefebvre
Andreas Tille wrote: > > Hello, > > could someone enlighten a fairly beginner how to define columns > of a table with the following features: > >CreateDate DEFAULT value should store current date and time create table mytable( CreateDate timestamp default timestamp('now'), ); >

[SQL] Using SETOF in plpgsql function

2000-08-23 Thread hlefebvre
Hello, I'd like to return a set of integer in an pl/pgsql function. How can I do that ? I've tried things like that, put I've an error when executing : CREATE FUNCTION SP_UPLES() RETURNS setof INTEGER AS ' DECLARE ID INTEGER; BEGIN select a into id from foo; return ID ; END;