time=6909.632..6909.632 rows=3758304 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on user_subscriptions u (cost=0.00..77415.54
rows=3746154 width=49) (actual time=3.624..4265.114 rows=3758304
loops=1)
Total runtime: 192585.437 ms
From: "t...@fuzzy.cz"
To: Pos
Hello List,
I have a query which use to run very fast now has turn into show stopper .
PostgreSQL:8.2
explain analyze select user_name,A.user_id, dnd_window_start, dnd_window_stop,
B.subs as subs, B.city_id as city_id, B.source_type as source_type from
2008/11/20 Rodrigo E. De León Plicet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:03 PM, novice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> sorry I get nothing :(
>
> Of course not. None of the dates you gave in the example overlap.
>
But it should still have the 1st entry wi
2008/11/20 brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> novice wrote:
>>
>> 2008/11/20 Adam Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
>>> select call.call_id,
>>> call.datetime,
>>> mobile_custodian.user_id,
>>> call.mobile_no
&
2008/11/20 Adam Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Now user Ben has passed his mobile to user Josh and we issued Josh his
>> mobile on 2008-10-15.
>>
>> 1. Is it possible for me to write a query that will have the fields
>>
>> call.call_id,
>> call.datetime,
>> mobile_custodian.user_id,
>> call.mobile_no
Hi,
We have two tables.
select * from
mobile_custodian;
custodian_id | user_id | issue_date | return_date | mobile_no
--+-++-+-
4 | Ben | 2008-10-11 | 2008-10-13 | 09455225998
5 |Josh | 2008-10-15 |
Perfect!
Thank you very mcuh :)
2008/6/16 A. Kretschmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> am Mon, dem 16.06.2008, um 11:48:01 +1000 mailte novice folgendes:
>> I have a table
>>
>> CREATE TABLE problem (
>> problem_id integer,
>> solution_count integer
>>
I have a table
CREATE TABLE problem (
problem_id integer,
solution_count integer
);
INSERT INTO problem VALUES (1001, 4);
INSERT INTO problem VALUES (1012, 11);
SELECT * from problem;
problem_id | solution_count
+---
1001 | 4
1012 |
i have a table
CREATE TABLE meter
(
meter_id integer NOT NULL,
no_of_bays integer,
CONSTRAINT meter_pkey PRIMARY KEY (meter_id)
)
INSERT INTO meter(
meter_id, no_of_bays)
VALUES (5397, 2);
INSERT INTO meter(
meter_id, no_of_bays)
VALUES (5409, 3);
select
On 07/09/2007, Filip Rembiałkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/9/5, Raj A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > correction:
> >
> > > The result I'm expecting for the above to be
> > >
> > >notification_time| finished_time | actual
> > > +--
correction:
> The result I'm expecting for the above to be
>
>notification_time| finished_time | actual
> ++-
2007-07-06 15:50:00+10 | 2007-07-09 07:10:00+10 | 01:20:00
> 2007-07-07 12:30:00+10 | 2007-07-09 07
Hello All,
SELECT notification_time, finished_time, sum(finished_time -
notification_time) as actual
FROM log
GROUP BY notification_time, finished_time;
gives me:
notification_time| finished_time | actual
++-
20
I am trying to record the following entries into a table. I'm curious
to know if there's an efficient/effective way of doing this? This
entries come from an ancient datalogger (note: separated by space and
uses YY/MM/DD format to record date)
Plain file sample.dat
3665 OK BS 07/08/1
Many many thanks for all the advice =)
On 21/08/07, Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Aug 20, 2007, at 19:52 , novice wrote:
>
> > Try 2: Here are my DDLs & DMLs
>
> Thanks for the data. It looks like the data you provided in the first
> s
On 21/08/07, Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now here's where I started having trouble. I can't figure out how to
> get 2 observations for week 29 (record_id 1 & 3) and 8 for week 30
> (record_id 2). Assuming the data is wrong (which is admittedly a poor
> assumption), I moved ahea
Try 2: Here are my DDLs & DMLs
-- Start
CREATE TABLE record
(
record_id integer PRIMARY KEY,
record_date timestamp with time zone NOT NULL
);
INSERT INTO record(record_id, record_date) VALUES ('1', '2007-07-23 11:30:37');
INSERT INTO record(record_id, record_date) VALUES ('2', '2007-07-27 1
Hi, We have the following three tables.
safety=> SELECT record_id, record_date FROM record;
record_id | record_date
---+
1 | 2007-07-23 11:30:37+10
2 | 2007-07-27 11:30:14+10
3 | 2007-07-17 13:15:03+10
(3 rows)
safety=> SELECT obser
Thank you :-))
That's so quick! Apologies for the error on my DDL statement
On 08/08/07, Phillip Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of novice
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 August 200
I have a table
CREATE TABLE meter
(
meter_id integer NOT NULL,
area_no integer NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT meter_pkey PRIMARY KEY (meter_id)
) ;
INSERT INTO meter(meter_id, no_of_bays) VALUES (1001, 4);
INSERT INTO meter(meter_id, no_of_bays) VALUES (1012, 6);
select meter_id, area_no from meter;
19 matches
Mail list logo