Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Perhaps, but I have heard of people using it successfully recently,
> whereas Nathaniel reported that audittrail2 seems to have obvious
> bugs.
Thanks for the tip. Do to poor searching on my part tablelog fell under
my radar. I'll try and out and see how it goes.
Nathaniel
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Rob Sargent escribió:
tablelog doesn't appear any more lively than the OPs audittrail2.
Perhaps, but I have heard of people using it successfully recently,
whereas Nathaniel reported that audittrail2 seems to have obvious bugs.
Fair enough.
--
Sent via p
Rob Sargent escribió:
> tablelog doesn't appear any more lively than the OPs audittrail2.
Perhaps, but I have heard of people using it successfully recently,
whereas Nathaniel reported that audittrail2 seems to have obvious bugs.
--
Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.Comman
tablelog doesn't appear any more lively than the OPs audittrail2.
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
What do others use to accomplish this? Do most pg users just write
triggers by hand? Or is there some nice auditing module that Google
just isn't revealing to me?
I think ta
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> What do others use to accomplish this? Do most pg users just write
> triggers by hand? Or is there some nice auditing module that Google
> just isn't revealing to me?
I think tablelog (to be found in pgfoundry too) is the most commonly
used audit module.
--
Alvaro Herre
