Hi, Achilleus,
Achilleus Mantzios wrote:
[schema trickery]
> Why do you think its ugly after all?
It is not ugly to split such things via schemas per se, but it is ugly
to use this schema trick together with a bunch of views, rules and
triggers to "upgrade" a legacy single-deployment application
O Markus Schaber έγραψε στις Apr 18, 2006 :
> Hi, Achilleus,
>
> Achilleus Mantzios wrote:
>
> > Now i am thinking of restructuring the whole architecture as:
> > - Create one EAR app for every mgmt company
> > - Create one DB USER for every mgmg company
> > - Create one SCHEMA (same as the USER
Hi, Achilleus,
Achilleus Mantzios wrote:
> Now i am thinking of restructuring the whole architecture as:
> - Create one EAR app for every mgmt company
> - Create one DB USER for every mgmg company
> - Create one SCHEMA (same as the USER) for every mgmt company
> (mgmtcompany1,mgmtcompany2,etc...
