Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Greg Toombs wrote:
>> What disaster do you foresee? Is that version unstable?
> Yes. There are known, unfixed bugs, and architectural problems that
> cannot be fixed.
We abandoned maintenance of the 7.1 branch in 2001. 7.2 was the first
version that
Hoookay. I'm currently negotiating with IX Webhosting to upgrade
their prehistoric software. Fellows, consider this a word of warning
that, if they don't upgrade, anyone wanting to use this host will be
stuck with PostgreSQL 7.1.3. If they do upgrade, I'll happily revoke
this warning. Anyway, t
Greg Toombs wrote:
> What disaster do you foresee? Is that version unstable?
Yes. There are known, unfixed bugs, and architectural problems that
cannot be fixed.
--
Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
--
What disaster do you foresee? Is that version unstable?
Tom Lane wrote:
Greg Toombs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
After reading a few more methods of doing things, I went with the
simplest one, as 1. time is of the essence, and 2. I'm stuck with
PostgreSQL 7.1 on the server I have t
Greg Toombs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After reading a few more methods of doing things, I went with the
> simplest one, as 1. time is of the essence, and 2. I'm stuck with
> PostgreSQL 7.1 on the server I have to develop for.
Egad. *Please* do not tell us you are intending to use 7.1 for prod
Hello, and thank you to Steven and everyone else that submitted input
on this issue.
After reading a few more methods of doing things, I went with the
simplest one, as 1. time is of the essence, and 2. I'm stuck with
PostgreSQL 7.1 on the server I have to develop for.
I set the primary key of
Hi Greg,
While not in a C++ framework, you might find that it's not too hard to
implement something similar in your system - It's called "Single Table
Inheritance." References to the Ruby on Rails implementation here:
http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails/pages/SingleTableInheritance
It's based
Just a little example of what I've been using on version 8.0.3 with total
satisfaction.
CREATE TABLE "public"."tblMovementDetails" (
"ID" INTEGER NOT NULL,
"PlanningDetailID" INTEGER NOT NULL,
"MovementID" INTEGER NOT NULL,
"UserID" VARCHAR(5) NOT NULL,
"Number" INTEGER DEFAULT 0 NOT N
> I want to design the foreign key scheme such that there are relationsbetween
> fruit and apple, and fruit and orange, that imply that apple isa fruit,
> and orange is a fruit.
Sometime in the future, you will be able to achieve this beautifully and easily
using postgresql's
feature known as tab
Greg Toombs wrote:
Hello.
I'm trying to figure out how to nicely implement a C++ class-like system with
PostgreSQL. Consider the following:
Don't do a lot of this myself, but I do know that there are several
object-relational mappers that do this sort of stuff for you. Might be
worth a bit
Hello.
I'm trying to figure out how to nicely implement a C++ class-like
system with PostgreSQL. Consider the following:
Tables Fruit, Apple, Orange
I want to design the foreign key scheme such that there are relations
between fruit and apple, and fruit and orange, that imply that apple is
a
11 matches
Mail list logo
