On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 10:04:45AM +0200, Achilleus Mantzios wrote:
> O Dennis Sacks Ýãñáøå óôéò Jan 31, 2005 :
>
> > Sam Adams wrote:
> >
> > >Anyway, I was wondering which would be a better way to store a large
> > >amount of files each a few megabytes in size. There could be hundreds of
> > >t
O Dennis Sacks έγραψε στις Jan 31, 2005 :
> Sam Adams wrote:
>
> >Anyway, I was wondering which would be a better way to store a large
> >amount of files each a few megabytes in size. There could be hundreds of
> >thousands of files altogether. If stored as BYTEAs this would put them
> >all in a
Sam Adams wrote:
Anyway, I was wondering which would be a better way to store a large
amount of files each a few megabytes in size. There could be hundreds of
thousands of files altogether. If stored as BYTEAs this would put them
all in a single table. Would this effect performance considerablely?
Hi,
Apologies if I've already sent a post asking this but I'm not sure if it
actually went through last time as it doesn't seem to be in my sent
items box.
Anyway, I was wondering which would be a better way to store a large
amount of files each a few megabytes in size. There could be hundreds of
