Re: [SQL] CHECK problem really OK now...

2001-09-26 Thread Tom Lane
Kovacs Baldvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I tried, and it works: the current CVS version really runs > happily the query what sent to heaven our 7.1 version of the > backend. I believe this traces to a fix I made in May: 2001-05-27 16:48 tgl * src/: backend/executor/execJunk.c, back

Re: [SQL] CHECK problem really OK now...

2001-09-24 Thread Roberto Mello
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 03:23:13PM -0400, Jan Wieck wrote: > > It help's saving life! Using the victims for that purpose > isn't abuse. It is turning grief, anger and sadness into > help and hope. > > Let blood become "Open Source". Give it for free and you'll > ge

Re: [SQL] CHECK problem really OK now...

2001-09-24 Thread Jan Wieck
Kovacs Baldvin wrote: > Hi everybody! > > I tried, and it works: the current CVS version really runs > happily the query what sent to heaven our 7.1 version of the > backend. > > Kevin: your original complex schema also runs smoothly. > > Thanks for our mindful developers! > > Regards, > Baldvin >

Re: [SQL] CHECK problem really OK now...

2001-09-24 Thread Josh Berkus
Baldvin, > Probably the chances for a prize went... :-(( However, is there > still a shortage of blod??? Last I checked, the American Red Cross does not want your blood right now -- they want it two weeks from now. Currently blood stores are full, but they get depleted pretty fast. Of course,

[SQL] CHECK problem really OK now...

2001-09-24 Thread Kovacs Baldvin
Hi everybody! I tried, and it works: the current CVS version really runs happily the query what sent to heaven our 7.1 version of the backend. Kevin: your original complex schema also runs smoothly. Thanks for our mindful developers! Regards, Baldvin I think Jan wrote: > Sorry, I missed