Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 18:02, A.M. wrote:
>> I have 560 columns of NUMERIC(10,14). To not run up against max column=20
>> restraints, I split the information into two tables. Does the column=20
>> limit on tables imply the same limit for views or selects or c
"A.M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have 560 columns of NUMERIC(10,14). To not run up against max column
> restraints, I split the information into two tables. Does the column
> limit on tables imply the same limit for views or selects or could I
> potentially select a row across both table
On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 18:02, A.M. wrote:
> I have 560 columns of NUMERIC(10,14). To not run up against max column
> restraints, I split the information into two tables. Does the column
> limit on tables imply the same limit for views or selects or could I
> potentially select a row across both t
I have 560 columns of NUMERIC(10,14). To not run up against max column
restraints, I split the information into two tables. Does the column
limit on tables imply the same limit for views or selects or could I
potentially select a row across both tables and make a view that hides
the split?
-