Hi Pedro;
I understand that at the moment it is more of a design limitation than a
bug. I think we should vote the desired behavior as a feature request,
however.
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
- Original Message -
From: "Pedro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Foreign keys, unique and primary key
Foreign keys, unique and primary key constraints do not meaningfully
inherit currently. At some point in the future, that's likely to change,
but for now you're pretty much stuck with workarounds (for example, using
a separate table to store the ids and triggers/rules on each of the
tables
in the
At 20:55 12/13/2003, you wrote:
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have some problem with INHERITS and foreign keys. I do not know if I have
> not got the clue or not. Anyway I have tried to simplify the problem so
> that you can guide me on the right track.
Foreign keys, un
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have some problem with INHERITS and foreign keys. I do not know if I have
> not got the clue or not. Anyway I have tried to simplify the problem so
> that you can guide me on the right track.
Foreign keys, unique and primary key constraint
Hi
I have some problem with INHERITS and foreign keys. I do not know if I have
not got the clue or not. Anyway I have tried to simplify the problem so
that you can guide me on the right track.
I have two slightly different object A and B where 95% is common both of
data and operations. Among t
