On 9/3/05, Julian Scarfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'd like a regex that matches 'CD' but not 'ABCD' in any part of the>> regex.From: "Bruno Wolff III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> Something like:
> (^.?CD)|([^B]CD)|([^A]BCD)Thanks to Bruno, and to Dawid who replied offline. The above does the jobnice
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 03:59:18PM +0100, Julian Scarfe wrote:
> Any plans for a Perl Compatible Regular Expression operator?
> http://www.pcre.org/
Why have Perl-Compatible things when you can have Perl itself? Just use
plperl.
> Or are two regex operators enough?
Only two? We have not only
I'd like a regex that matches 'CD' but not 'ABCD' in any part of the
regex.
From: "Bruno Wolff III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Something like:
(^.?CD)|([^B]CD)|([^A]BCD)
Thanks to Bruno, and to Dawid who replied offline. The above does the job
nicely.
Any plans for a Perl Compatible Regular Exp
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 14:11:37 +0100,
Julian Scarfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like a regex that matches 'CD' but not 'ABCD' in any part of the regex.
>
> Is there a workaround that allows me to do this as a single regex?
>
> I know I could and together a ~ and !~ like this
>
> # selec
I'd like a regex that matches 'CD' but not 'ABCD' in any part of the regex.
In Perl I'd use a negative lookbehind assertion (?Julian
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
