Re: [SQL] ORDER BY in definition of views

2000-06-09 Thread Jan Wieck
Niall Smart wrote: > Guys, > > Does anyone know if this is on the radar for 7.1? Yes, it is not. Jan -- #==# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me.

Re: [SQL] ORDER BY in definition of views

2000-06-08 Thread Tom Lane
Niall Smart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does anyone know if this is on the radar for 7.1? 7.2 ... regards, tom lane

Re: [SQL] ORDER BY in definition of views

2000-06-08 Thread Niall Smart
Michael Ansley wrote: > > Would there be a particular reason to do this? > I like to define views for lookups (i.e. job titles, departments, accounts, whatever). It would be nice if I could just do a select * from whatever_vw instead of having to remember to put the order by whatever_name cla

RE: [SQL] ORDER BY in definition of views

2000-06-08 Thread Michael Ansley
Title: RE: [SQL] ORDER BY in definition of views Would there be a particular reason to do this? MikeA >>   -Original Message- >>   From: Niall Smart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>   Sent: 08 June 2000 14:47 >>   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>   Subject: [

[SQL] ORDER BY in definition of views

2000-06-08 Thread Niall Smart
Guys, Does anyone know if this is on the radar for 7.1? Niall -- Niall Smart email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: (087) 8052390