Tom Lane escribió:
Martin Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom Lane escribió:
Martin Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I have always heard that modification queries should be EXECUTED in PL.
AFAICR.
Run far away from whatever source gave you that advice...
Sorry, it was with DDL comma
Martin Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane escribió:
>> Martin Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> I have always heard that modification queries should be EXECUTED in PL.
>>> AFAICR.
>>
>> Run far away from whatever source gave you that advice...
> Sorry, it was with DDL commands
Tom Lane escribió:
> Martin Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I have always heard that modification queries should be EXECUTED in PL.
>> AFAICR.
>
> Run far away from whatever source gave you that advice...
Sorry, it was with DDL commands.
---(end of broadcast)--
Martin Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rodrigo De León escribió:
>> "In any case, the longest possible character string that can be stored
>> is about 1 GB."
>>
> I was asking about the limit in the argument. Is it the same as the
> limits the types have in table definition?
Yeah, ultima
Rodrigo De León escribió:
On Nov 21, 2007 8:23 AM, Martin Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(BTW, which it that limit if it exists?).
"In any case, the longest possible character string that can be stored
is about 1 GB."
See:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/datatype-charact
On Nov 21, 2007 8:23 AM, Martin Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (BTW, which it that limit if it exists?).
"In any case, the longest possible character string that can be stored
is about 1 GB."
See:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/datatype-character.html
> So I made the function to
I was doing some tests to see if I could find a max size for an argument
of type TEXT in a PL/PgSQL function (BTW, which it that limit if it
exists?).
So I made the function to test:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION datoGrande(TEXT) RETURNS BOOLEAN AS $body$
BEGIN
EXECUTE $ins1$
INSERT INTO funcdatogra
