Hi,
The final result seems to be the same, I just was curious about the
standard behavior. Does the SQl says something about this execution
order?
Thanks for your response.
salu2
dario estepario ...
2005/8/15, Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
Ok, thanks for the responses guys.
Then, in the case where the final result is the same, could we think
the parentheses in the FROM clause, as a tool to clarify the query to
the user? Since in the end, this order could be changed by the
implementation for performance reasons.
salu2
dario estepari
Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Dario Bahena Tapia wrote:
>> The final result seems to be the same, I just was curious about the
>> standard behavior. Does the SQl says something about this execution
>> order?
> I believe SQL defines the order to pay attention to p
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Dario Bahena Tapia wrote:
> The final result seems to be the same, I just was curious about the
> standard behavior. Does the SQl says something about this execution
> order?
I believe SQL defines the order to pay attention to parens, so A join (B
join C) style clauses result
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I thought that the parenthesis in the table expression
> (FROM clause), could be used to indicate the desired
> evaluation order. But, I tried with a couple of samples
> and the explain command returned me the same result; no matter
> what parentheses
Hi,
I thought that the parenthesis in the table expression
(FROM clause), could be used to indicate the desired
evaluation order. But, I tried with a couple of samples
and the explain command returned me the same result; no matter
what parentheses association I used. I am using only INNER JOINs.
