the LDP project doesn't allow for 'taking over' someone elses work, but
Thomas is working the sites maintainer on an appropriate solution for the
problem, as even though its removed, it will come back again *groan*
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Thomas Swan wrote:
> > Has been removed from the LDP websit
> Has been removed from the LDP website.
>Good news indeed!
>
>Now what are we going to do with it?
>
>Can the original document's source be made available so that
>somebody can do the needed work without having to re-key.
>
>There is a _lot_ of very good information in there buried underneath t
> > Has been removed from the LDP website.
>
>>Good news indeed!
>>
>>Now what are we going to do with it?
>>
>>Can the original document's source be made available so that
>>somebody can do the needed work without having to re-key.
>>
>>There is a _lot_ of very good information in there buried u
Hello,
The Postgres team from PGSQL, Inc. has agreed to provide us with a new
version.
J
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
>On Tue, 06 Feb 2001 08:50, Poet/Joshua Drake wrote:
>> Has been removed from the LDP website.
>
>Good news indeed!
>
>Now what are we going to do with it?
>
On Tue, 06 Feb 2001 08:50, Poet/Joshua Drake wrote:
> Has been removed from the LDP website.
Good news indeed!
Now what are we going to do with it?
Can the original document's source be made available so that
somebody can do the needed work without having to re-key.
There is a _lot_ of very g
Has been removed from the LDP website.
J
--
--
CommandPrompt - http://www.commandprompt.com
OpenDocs, LLC. - http://www.opendocs.org
LinuxPorts - http://www.linuxports.com
LDP - http://www.linuxdoc.org
--
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "19
